MetArt Review

I noticed something that makes me not like the Met Art photos. The girl's heels never are allowed to touch anything. If they are standing, they must be on their toes with heels lifted. Same when sitting or any other pose. This is fake in the sense that girls do not walk or sit with their heels not touching anything. It very much like fake tits, only in this its fake poses. It makes it impossible to like anything on this site because of the unnatural poses.

Did you notice it too? The guys from Metart don't really bother with quality. The site is good for young masturbators who don't care who to masturbate about. For true connoisseurs of erotic art, this site is less and less interesting

The most popular comments are those that criticize Metart for: 1. Excessive retouching and editing. 2. Poor camera focus. 3. Monotonous sets and lack of creativity. Such comments collect the largest number of likes - up to 12-13. I would recommend the site administration to pay attention to these comments. However, most of the girls are cute and sexy. *edited to meet community guidelines.

The women and quality of photography are very good. But, the billing practices aren't first class. I didn't receive a proper receipt for my purchase, and found an additional unexpected $24.95 charge to my credit card. I'm emailing their support asking them to reverse the charge.

Rabbitsreviews why did you delete my comment? Do you support racism? I posted it again, please do not delete it or I will be forced to contact anti-racist organizations such as blacklivesmatter.com or HateCrimes....

(Quantity: 5/10) (Picture quality: 6/10) Even though these are 4k and 1080 videos, the color and picture is often distorted for "artistic" effect. (Filming quality: 4/10) It's a great concept: show beautiful girls slowly walking through a nice house or around a scenic garden. But it's poorly executed. The camera moves too much. It quickly pans across the girls over and over so fast you can't get a good look. And the girls usually cover themselves with their hands or arms just as the camera scrolls across their bodies, blocking the view. Worse, most videos are chopped up into hundreds of two or three second bits. They also play around with the colors, contrast, brightness, and frame rate to make it seem artistic. They will put the girls in very dark shadows, or they will fog the lens, or they will put the foreground out of focus. It's all too distracting. They'll do a close of up the girls boobs, for example. But they put them in the upper corner of the frame, so you only get to see part of them. It's so bizarre. All of this subtracts from the beauty of the girls. (Quality of girls: 4/10) The girls are all tall, thin, and hipless. Most are east European girls and some are as flat as a board. (Variety: 2/10) The videos are all solo or duo girls undressing and rubbing themselves to gentle music. The only variety is the clothes and setting. The girls are all the same look, just some are a little darker skinned and some lighter. (Unlimited Downloads: 10/10) Unlimited (Download speed: 10/10) Outstanding 7GB/s. (Ease of use: 7/10) Very easy to use after you get past registration. Signing up has a lot of upsell, some of it sneaky -- like how you are automatically set to pay an extra $30/month for their sister errotica-archives.com site (which is exactly like Metart, just 1/3 the size). Pictures are easy to look through and download. Their payment service accepts U.S. pre-paid cards for anonymity.

Amazing site. I definitely recommend it. Customer support is always ready to solve any problem you have.

MetArt is a site I have been aware of for many years but having subscribed once before have never felt the urge to resubscribe. However, I received a 'Black Friday offer' of 1 months subscription for the equivalent of about £5 so decided to take another look and was pleasantly surprised at what I found. There is a huge archive of both videos and photo sets, more than enough for anyone and with regular, daily, updates. So even at a full price membership there is is good value and everything is downloadable with no download limit. Some Eastern European sites - most if not all models on here are Eastern European – seem to have a stable of clones, so many of the models look identical and are indistinguishable, that is not what I found here. Yes, all of the models are young, late teens or early twenties, yes they are all shaved and yes they are all really slim but there is a variety of appearance within the portfolio of models that I found enjoyable. Each video and photo set told a story and were downloadable in a range of formats right up to 4K. I chose 1080 and the videos looked really good. I get the impression that while many are genuine 1080 some of the earlier material, the site goes back to around 2006 if not earlier, has been upscaled to 1080 from a lower resolution and that is immediately obvious but a minor issue. This is not a hard core site, the videos and photos are tasteful and somewhat artistic and I like the way that the girls interact with the camera rather than having a somewhat blank stare that girls on some sites offer. In short if you want to see good quality video and photos of a large portfolio of attractive slim, shaved young Eastern European women this is for you. There are some really gorgeous girls.

Sorry to say that but I had unpleasant experience at Metart. I got my 1-year membership recently. I kept requesting to post more black models since I was interested in the girls of my race. (Ok, who wouldn't ?) Pretty soon all my comments were deleted and my privilege to post feedback was banned. I don't want to hurt anybody but I was shocked by that manifestation of racism. Grief indeed.

If Meart team cares about what people think, please read all that comments below. First of all the photos quality supposed to be much better in these days. Weird but the photos made 10-12 years ago are more sharper, clearer, and have natural color and lighting comparing to modern ones. Second, the most of sets are monotonous like the photographer doesn't care at all about what he is doing. Third - and the worst - close shot is over used in the most of recent sets. Other commentators are right: that makes Meart sort of gynecologist's illustrations rather than erotic art site.