Like:
Don't Like:
$2495
30 Days
We may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through our links. It is how you support this site–thank you!
I don't know about you, but I don't always like it when they film girls from so far away. Sure, I love seeing every inch of a babe from her head to her toes, but when she's playing with herself, I want to see a closeup of the action. That's where In The Crack comes in with their high-quality videos. You get a real inside look as these girls spread it for the camera! If you're a fan of softcore porn sites or masturbation porn, you should be very intrigued.
They say their videos are designed for "the voyeur who likes to explore the girl's pretty bits up close with nothing left to the imagination." And you definitely get that in these solo scenes, plus a selection of lesbian ones, where two or more girls get each other off with their mouths, fingers, and toys. Some use speculums to give you a peek inside their pink, and they also pee, shove things up their ass , and have squirting orgasms.
The collection is huge, with 1744 videos and 1702 galleries with anywhere from 100 to 250 high-resolution pics. You can usually expect a lot more in-your-face close-ups of these girls' lady bits and their round behinds. Updates are about every four days, giving you 8-10 scenes every month.
One of the sections you can explore is the Favorites page. No, this isn't where your favorite scenes are, but instead, it's a list of suggested performers from the staff as well as the girls with the highest member ratings. Right now, the highest-rated girl is a brunette beauty named the Czech Republic. She has over 40 photo shoots, with her top one being from Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. She poses naked by a pool with a gorgeous Mexican vista behind her. She walks around, nude except for heels, then gets back on a lounge chair and spreads her pussy for the camera.
Lexa's shoot is another great example of what makes In The Crack so special - the production values. The scenes are filmed in gorgeous locales, like on boats with tropical views, in posh mansions, on picturesque beaches, and other locations. The scenes are usually 30-40 minutes and are divided into clips. Some even come with a 3D option.
The video quality depends on the membership you choose. There's a Basic option with SD streams for $9.95, and for $10 more, you can up that resolution to HD. The Standard membership, which we list on our review, adds downloads to your package. If you want to pay a few bucks more, Plus gives you Full HD videos.
If you're a fan of 4K porn, the membership option "4K " provides you with Ultra HD streams and downloads but at $39.95/month. The last option is Ultimate at a very expensive $69.95/month. If you find all the different memberships confusing, the chart on the join page will help you out.
There's a basic search engine, categories to browse, and an area to leave a comment. You can sort the collection by date, location (they take place all over the world), a model's nationality, lesbian only, and a few other options. You also get a model index, but more on that below.
One thing that stuck out to me was the Ethnicity category. We all know that porn sites tend to be very focused on white girls unless it's a specific ethnicity. But on the page, it states: "Some models do not fit easily into any one category or may be mixed ethnicities or of unknown ethnicity and thus are not represented here. The Caucasian race is not represented here because they make up 90% of the entire site."
For customer service, you'll need to submit a ticket. No word on how long they take to respond, though. If you want to cancel, you'll have to do it through your biller. The process for each is simple, but if you do encounter any issues, let us know and we'll help you out.
The membership options can get expensive. But the biggest issue is that depending on your membership level, you may not get as many downloads as you want. Obviously, that's not a problem with the two streaming-only subscriptions, but even the HD one has a limit of 15GB per day calculated at 5GB/hour. The Plus option puts the limit at 30GB/day, the 4K is 50GB, and the Ultimate membership? Well, that one is unlimited. With the Standard, you also don't get Zip files, but with the three more expensive ones, you do.
Memberships aside, the interface has some issues, too. First, the site is not optimized for mobile , and these days, with so many users browsing porn on their phones, it's not ideal. Though, to be fair, browsing on your computer isn't always a walk in the park, either. The design looks a bit dated, but it all comes down to personal taste. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, seems to be the motto here. There's also no rating system, tags, or favorites section.
When it comes to the videos, there are two gripes you may have. First, the movies are split into different scenes. That means you can only download them in clips instead of the full-length version, which I'm sure isn't optimal for most people. There's also some older content on the site dating back to the early 2000s. As you might imagine, those videos are in SD and you won't see anything above 480p.
The model index isn't really much of an index in the traditional sense. It's more of a category for the videos, so while you can browse all of the performers, when you click on their photo, it just lists all of their content with barely any info about them. It's a shame because we get so up close and personal with the girls in other ways.
They may not have any bonuses, but even without any extra bells and whistles, In The Crack has high-quality content featuring models up-close and personal, with plenty more on the way. Their membership options can be confusing at first and it's unfortunate that the best option is so pricey. But you can always weigh the pros and cons of each and see which one works best with your needs.
see 2+ Top Close-Up Porn Sites or all Premium Porn Sites
Still having trouble?
Are downloads included?
Yes. Download options depend on your membership.
Payment Methods
| Image Quality | 15/15 |
| Usability | 7/10 |
| Updates | 7/10 |
| Content Amount | 14/15 |
| Value | 9/10 |
| Exclusivity | 20/20 |
| Download / Streaming | 5/5 |
| Features | 2/5 |
| Bonus Material | 6/10 |
| Rabbit Score | 85% |
| MP4 | 3840x2160; 25000K; Streaming |
| MP4 | 3840x2160; 25000K |
| MP4 | 1920x1080; 8000K |
| MP4 | 1280x720; 4000K |
User Comments
By mrgreenbeanz on Dec 18, 2020
Very poorly run website. Lots of technical problems. Downloads not working.. Constant login issues. Slow response from Homepage. Spent more time messaging support than on the website. Not worth the headache.
By BlackAndProud on Jul 6, 2020
Others are right: huge and unnatural looking butts made by weird camera angles ruin this site.
By Joe90Bryant on Jul 15, 2019
A lot has been said about this site re cost/pricing etc. As a new member i can say with confidence that whilst it is blatantly more expensive ($30 or £) for the kind of pic/video/d'load options you would expect for prob half the price elsewhere, what is not in any doubt is the TOP quality of the models. filming, locals, and THE best 1080 i've seen outside of the DDF network. The pussy, anal, butt, leg AND boob camerawork is hot as hell. There are plenty of recognised models performing the kind of solo scenes you wished they had done on other hardcore sites!. To sum up, whilst pricey, it is well worth it for maybe a 3mnth sub. One point to note, the site layout is a bit early 00's but it is simple and easy to navigate and clear to use. Hope this helps!
By tarin on Jun 9, 2019
I had same difficulties with my password. That guys need to fix that somehow. What I really hate is over used unnatural camera angles. They call it "imaginative camera angles that enhance the girl's nakedness and reveal her best side." In the real world that leads to the unnatural look when the girl's but looks five times bigger than her head. Your negative comments in the site will be banned as well. That guys don't like them.
By viktor on May 29, 2019
I subscribed this site for 69.99$, they sent me purchase ID and transaction ID. They sent me everything but my password and username. I was not able to enter that damn site. To me it looks like fraud for 70 bucks. Stay away - the only thing I may say.
By caprilover on Feb 27, 2018
IntheCrack has a lot of really awesome content. It definitely caters to the admirer of the female booty and vulva. I only had a subscription for a month, but I learned to really appreciate the private parts of a lady. The videos are of stellar quality 4K and photos are fairly sizable too. There's definitely a lot of ladies to explore! The one drawback though is the pricing. The site is a little more expensive their your average site in this genre and there's a total breakdown on streaming/download options that are kind of off-putting. That is definitely not typical of any adult entertainment sites. But I'd say it's worth a look, especially for those amateur "gynecologists" and general students of the female anatomy :P
By wentworth on Dec 11, 2017
This whole carrot-dangling pricing system is annoying and dissuades the consumer IMO. To their owners: I had my credit card out but was turned off that I need to spend $70 to get what other sites charge $25 for. I'm going back to FTV as I know what I'm getting there and it's not confusing. They should review this and just make it 20-30 with occasional specials. Too bad
By Licker on Nov 1, 2017
Just a note the fine folks who manage In The Crack. PLEASE bring in some more slender women, petite women, flat-chested women who have minuscule assholes, TEENS, Russian slender beauties. I know you can find more slender women who show us their cracks. Think about it: if they are thin, their buttholes are just tight and gorgeous. Keep up the good camera work, but if you don't vary the size of the girls, then some other site will probably start to compete with you, and you are unique.
By SexAddict on Aug 31, 2017
Their tiered pricing is a pain in the ass, and not typical of such websites. Their "large" photos are only 1800 x 1200, and my monitor is 1920 x 1080, so I get a little letterboxing, which is annoying. Why, in this day and age, can't a site can't provide a larger image for the premium prices they charge? 2000 x 3000 has become the norm. All that said, the photography is exquisite, the models beautiful and the content plentiful.
By Capt.A.Hole on Aug 13, 2016
Very high quality videos, beautiful women. Almost too beautiful, I wish they had some older than 30 and with breasts larger than a B cup. If your into ASS this is heaven. I didn't have any problems downloading except for the limits they have depending on the plan you paid for.