Yanks Review

(Quantity 7/10) Around 3000 (Picture quality 6/10) These videos are old. There is a range in picture quality, but none are very good. (Filming quality 6/10) Like at ATK Hairy, the instant the girl gets undressed, she grabs her boobs and covers them up so the audience can't see them. Then the girl will lay down and the camera will go low and focuses on her crotch so you can't see anything else. There are many exceptions, but this is a common pattern. Moreover, the camerawork is too artistic. The camerawomen likes to make part of the scene in focus and everything else blurry. Sometimes the entire scene is out of focus and often the camera is too close. Then she will go out wide to get pictures of the girl's feet. On the positive side, the camera sways some, but doesn't shake like at other amateur sites. And many videos use a tripod so the image is still. The interviews are just descriptions of how they masturbate -- so clinical that all of it's sexiness is striped out. (Quality of girls 7/10) On average, the girls are very attractive. Several are from Girls out West or Abby Winters, and a lot are Portland/Seattle/No Cal amateurs.. (Variety 7/10) There are many different themes, shapes, and sizes. Most are solo girls. (Unlimited Downloads 10/10) Unlimited (Download speed 9/10) Very fast 4-6GB/s (Ease of use 2/10) Worse feature at Yanks is that they wouldn't let me cancel. They claimed my info was incorrect. And this site is deceptive. They claim videos were made this month, when I've seen them on Pornhub around 5 years ago. They also claim every format above 480 to be HD. Most still pictures are too small to fill a modern monitor. There are no previews for videos. However, the videos are easy to scroll through and download. Their payment service accepts U.S. pre-paid cards for anonymity.

Generally, the content is good and the women are very attractive amateurs and the videos are well done (not all but most). However, I just today noticed that half of the videos posted as "recent" (which included a recent date for their posting) are videos that were on the site two, three, or four years (or more) ago. I think reposting old content as "new" is dishonest at best (arguably fraudulent) especially for return customers. I certainly do not think this site is the only site to do this. But given that in the past I regularly subscribe to this content due to its quality of videos, I feel cheated and I will likely never subscribe to it again.

Hot hot hot. Super sexy girls and the filming is WAY better than the usual crap. I first found this site right when it started and she was doing it with her boyfriend. The interviews are great, very erotic, and you get to know them a bit. The girls tend to be really attractive, too. Their openness, honesty, candor, and sense of fun really works. My only wish is that they'd have an advanced search function. I'd love to see them in some boy/girl sex scenes too but I guess that isn't their thing. Also, the review mentions an "active user community" but I can't find any link to a discussion forum or anything. Comments on videos is not an "active community."

Check your credit card statement. I had a mysterious charge to "FIX and SLIM X" for $75 shortly after subscribing to this. I can't say for sure it was them, just check your statement.<br/>

The site is OK, but after downloading the first hundred or so videos, the girls started looking the same, doing the exact same thing, in the exact same position. What was most annoying about downloading from this site is that around one-third of the downloads terminated early, requiring an additional download to fix it.

You say above that there are no download limits. In fact, downloads are limited to about 3GB a day, when this limit is reached, you are no longer allowed to download until the following day. In my view, this is a restriction.<br/>

The best videos are excellent, but there's not enough. Many are poor quality and the sets seem spread out to squeeze several videos out of a single shoot. Doesn't really live up to the glossy promotion. <br/>

I just want to add some common sense to these reviews as they all seem fake, I would say the 100 is the owner and the other probably are competitors. I am a female masturbation connoisseur and Yanks is absolutely a go to site. They are amateur, so for JC to compare them to FTV which is a great glam site is just odd. You will see girls here that you will see no where else. Also to CC, Yanks videos go back to 2002 so those older videos are not the same quality as the ones shot in 2012, that is just a reality of tech. But the amount of videos will keep you happy. In my opinion some girls on any site, like life, are going to fake it, but most don't here. Some of the girls our loud, some quiet, some have contractions and some don't over all I think it's a great site. They should update more, however when they do it is worth your time and money.

Ok and I did like the vids BUT. Resolution is only medium. Some 1280x720 but lots is less. Bit rates ok but not that high. Girls ok. The promos are great but they are the BEST you will see. If you really want to try this, go to masterbationpage.com and do the three day trial. It takes you to Yanks and in three days you can see enough to decide (I cancelled on the first day)

Okay there are a few genuine orgasms, but the models are all amateurs and very few are actually attractive. If you're looking for a few vids of "real" "normal" girls cumming subscribe. Otherwise there are other sites out there which are more than ten times as good, FTV, inthecrack.com. They have professional models actually cumming - for real - in a huge majority of their videos and they look good doing it. Here their videography is technically lacking, the girls fake it quite often, somtimes they say there are real orgasm contractions when there aren't.... i'd avoid in hindsight.