APD Nudes Review

Rabbits no longer link to this site, but should you find yourself here from a search engine because you're wondering if it's worth a look... no. It's really not difficult to see why APD Nudes isn't updating anymore. While the photography quality is reasonable (although not all exclusive) and the videos aren't bad for what they are, APD is one of those sites that treats customers as the enemy. On a primarily photography site, they implement an hourly download limit that prevents you from downloading more than 5 photosets in an hour. They also have a big ol' rant in the T&Cs, which I ended up reading while waiting for the download limit to expire, in which they accuse anyone of using a VPN, people with dynamic IP addresses, or anyone who dares own more than one PC as some sort of scammer out to cause them bankruptcy. Such rampant paranoia towards paying customers is probably the reason that tumbleweed now drifts through the site. Download managers? Nope, they don't like them either because heaven forbid you might try and organise downloads to make things easier on yourself. Shame on you! Downloading videos is interesting - they offer an MP4 for 720p, and put the 1080p versions in a FLV container which is odd enough behaviour before we get to the part where their video files come in a ZIP file. How much bandwidth do they think they're saving with this? Half a MB per video? Really bizarre. The site itself is a chore to navigate. Who needs a search function, right? Not APD when you've got a list of seasons and non-specific galleries you can browse. Oh, sure, you can click through to 'Models' and select from a drop-down menu so large, it's akin to doomscrolling on Twitter to try and find something but there is no indication of how many photosets/videos are available until you click on someone's name. Do yourself a favour and save your money. While they have some rarities, like Lolly Lopez, their abject contempt for their own customers is plain to see.

I signed up for this site recently and many of these reviews are somewhat out of date, so here's an update. The content is good. That's not why I give this 2 stars. It's everything else. 1) Don't expect updates, it's an archive now which is at least mentioned. 2) Website has very poor functionality. Viewing a model's page limits you to seeing 12 of their photosets on that page, but you can see all their videos for some reason (hit "more"). This means wading through the "seasons" to find the sets not on the page if you're looking for someone specific. God help you if you want to search, there is no search. 3) There IS a download limit, but it's slightly less draconian than it used to be (going by the reviews). You get an hourly allotment data and once you exceed it the site tells you to wait x minutes. You can now open multiple connections (each limited to a max of 1.2 MB/s) but in my experience any more than 4 and the server turns into a pumpkin causing ALL active downloads to fail. The off-putting language is still in the TOS. 4) The site screws with download managers. Browser only. 5) Downloads can fail for reasons unclear (even if you aren't opening a lot of connections), and none of the files are small. I had about a 10% failure rate overall but it could come in bursts which was frustrating. 6) Photo zips can be incompetently packaged. I have found some photo zips containing the set twice for no reason. 2x the download size as a result. 7) Some videos cannot be downloaded. This means to download them you have to open up the web viewer, view its page source, find the source file for the video, put that in the address bar. Bleh. 8) Some photosets randomly are not available for zip download. They do eventually come back though. Unclear why this happens. This all makes viewing content from this site is a job, not a pleasure. Bonus: the paranoid owner might cancel your sub if he doesn't like your email address, that happened to my friend a few years ago.

Why does Rabbit's state "Download Limits: NO" when this is actually one of the WORST sites for downloading EVER? It's one download per hour, PERIOD. If you even TRY to get around the restriction, they'll block ALL downloads. This is one of the craziest sites in existence and you have to be crazy even to deal with them. Read their legal terms. "Downloads in zip file formats are offered as a complimentary service to your membership agreement. The site owners reserve the right to restrict access to zip files at any time and without prior notification, justification or refund." These smart-asses are trying to say that you have ZERO right to download with your membership, that downloads are not part of your subscription (merely a 'free service' that they're 'giving' you and can RESTRICT and BLOCK at their whim). Stay away from these clowns. And, as much as I like Rabbit's, it's a bit ridiculous to have people here complaining about APD's insane limits for at least 2 years and still have the "Download Limits: NO" on the site.<br/>

APD nudes has great stuff but is an annoying site. On the very top of the apd home site is the following hint (not given through sign up, of course): "Welcome to APD Nudes. Great .. you are using Firefox v16 on Windows 7 which is supported. Please note that to ensure fair usage for all members, downloads may only be started once every hour per photo set or video." This means that downloading stops suddenly, and can NOT proceed from there. Download seems then to be blocked for some time. With "netstat -o" command, you can find out, that there is only ONE connection not faster than 2Mb for downloading zip files. So one image set lasts approximately half a hour. I cannot recommend to join this site therefore.

I was entusiastic when on the site were published the sets of Joceline Brooke Hamilton, a real scoop! So for Sarah E and other wonderful girls. Quality of images are quite perfect. But one fact is really not excusable: the site proposed videos and images of model Cerise (aka Roxy) just published some years ago in Twistys (Roxy) and KarupsHA. Itsn't cool for APDNudes, usually proposing exclusivities and news. And, no words about this on the site comments. I would prefer a pair of words about the first origin of the sets, it would be a more honest behaviour. After all, year after year the general quality of models seems go down. The video are noisily borded, making the real definition of the videos less than declared. I confirm the slow dowloading velocity and the complicate navigation of the site.

I joined yesterday and that the most frustrating experience of navigation ever. I have to log in after every download and the download of files of pictures is very slow. After many downloads a warning tells me that the site is unreachable. May be it is a problem of maintenance but for now I can consider that I subscribe to a non operational web site.

First of all, the models are for the most part stunningly attractive, European and American, many from the UK. The selection is currently limited to only 83 models. The photo layouts are well designed and beautifully shot. The download gives you the choice of low, medium, and high resolution, and the high resolution is outstanding. The videos are well done, HD, ranging from very softcore to some really hot masturbation scenes. Unfortunately, the videos are accompanied by music, most of which is overly loud, not sensual, not exactly what you want to listen to while watching a beautiful woman bring herself to orgasm. The download speeds are very slow. As an example it took 2 hours to download a 572 mb video using Windows 7 and a broadband connection. The time of day, or day of the week does not seem to matter. I would have given this site a much higher rating were it not for the very slow downloads.