Female POV Review

You're a guy and looking through the paper circa 2006 and see an advertisement for males who want to be pornstars - it's your lucky day, right? Think again, especially if it's for the porn site Female POV . When the webmistress says she wants to see if you've got what it takes, she means it! This female point-of-view action definitely has a Femdom overtone, as there are some strapons involved.

While the dudes who tried out for FemalePOV might have liked the experience, it seems as though the concept wasn't popular enough to draw a decent number of ladies to the site. I say this because the website has remained unchanged for years. I guess the producers abandoned it to seek out more profitable ventures.

We've been left with videos in which the sex has been filmed entirely from the perspective of some rather sexually aggressive women. That is, our sharp-tongued webmistress films the guys' auditions as they lick her pussy and try to deliver a pornstars-quality fuck.

There aren't any actual photos to be had, only vid caps. These might serve as a way to preview the movies , but because there is so little main content, you're hardly going to need to pick and choose what to watch. You can make your way through all of it in rather short order.

There are only 11 videos. They can be downloaded in a Windows Media format that offers playback that can't be considered anything better than below average. They come in three large segments, as well as shorter clips. Having made no attempt to add new content, they could have at least tried to improve the small amount of existing material they make available to us.

Nevertheless, you're still left with 12 full-access bonus sites, including Creampie Surprise and Throat Jobs. There are also extra picture galleries and video feeds covering various niches. This additional content helps to add value to a membership, but it isn't enough to save the site. It would be refreshing to enjoy some porn from the Female POV , but the quality of what's offered on this website is just too poor.