Cricket Babes will definitely leave you wanting more. First of all, there's no need to pluralize the word babe in this particular case. There aren't multiple models offered on the site. There aren't even many sections to this overly amateurish and unappealing-looking site. I've rarely seen such a minimalist approach to offering porn.
The only positive thing to be said about CricketBabes is that it has some exclusive material to offer. Perhaps the guy who made the site should have waited until there had been a few more theme appropriate shoots done before trying to turn his tiny collection into an entirely separate site on his little network.
There are 11 photo galleries of big, but not high-res photos. They do feature a cute enough amateur with a fresh face and voluptuous little bod. Moreover, although some scenes are shot in her bedroom where she uses a dildo, there are several layouts where she does indeed pose outside with a cricket bat and wicket.
Nevertheless, it's a bit of a stretch to find that so little content could possibly be enough to build an entire site around, but I guess that's what its creator found to be a reasonable choice.
I guess if the site appeared to be growing steadily things might be different. However, there have been no updates in more than a year. That's especially frustrating considering that there are no videos whatsoever, so the site is entirely dependent on the photos it possesses.
There are eight full-access bonus sites, including British Slags, XB Babes, Rose Cabs, Naked Paint Balling and Posh Wife. The other sites contain some videos and at least a few of them seem to update their content on a regular basis. However, even with the bonuses Cricket Babes doesn't really seem worth it.
|Try these similar site(s):|
|Cross Sales: No|
|Pic sets: 11+||Pics per set: 70||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: N/A+||HD Porn: No||DRM protection: No|
|Average Length: 0 mins||Full length videos: No||Streaming: No|
|Condoms: N/A||Download Limits: No
Pros & Cons
-few photo sets
11/02/2009- From 57 to 55: No recent updates, amount score adjusted to current criteria. -Bryce - Initial review: 9/28/2007