Porn ReviewsSpecialsAdult PersonalsPorn TrialsPorn BlogSearchBookmark
Video
Digital Desire Video

Review
English | Français

Some desires are considered universal. For example, we all want love and acceptance. I also think many of us crave seeing naked babes who are exceptionally hot, so we can fantasize that they love us and accept our advances. Assuming you're also into that groove, the beautiful photography and high-quality videos on Digital Desire should also be your thing.

Everything about DigitalDesire is great, but for starters let me tell you that you get 1,133 videos. You'll find that many offer high-def playback and the most recent ones are in Full HD. The older material is good too, so no worries there.

The content is pretty much all solo, with plenty of nudity and lots of gentle pussy play. They are beautifully shot and artistic, with music playing in the background. Fortunately, the music doesn't always drown out the moaning. I can still hear myself clearly - just a little joke, but it's funny because it's true.

There's also some toy play and very alluring lesbian shoots. I mean, these are some of the most beautiful chicks you'll ever see, so two of them together is going to blow your mind. Rihanna Rimes will earn lots of points from you as you watch her finger her tight muff on a bed.

There are also 2,916 photo sets and they can all be downloaded in Zip files or viewed in automatic slideshows. Many of them come with high-res shots. Again, these models are gorgeous, with stunning bodies, and the photographers are clearly not amateurs. They know what they are doing and provide some great shots of the women in all their nude glory. You will find lesbian and masturbation pics as well. Check out Malena Morgan and Hayden Hawkens. You'll be glad you did.

New movies get added to the website two to four times a week and photos get posted on the days in between, so you're getting new content pretty much every single day. There's a members' forum that you can keep busy with and there are other fun extras as well, like desktop wallpaper.

Digital Desire is a gorgeous site with gorgeous models doing gorgeous things. If you love lovely ladies you should give the website a look. An advanced search would be nice, though, and having some bios would help you get to know these stunning babes more.

By:
Number of Reviews: 1422
Average Score: 64.3

Photos
Contact Rabbit
Write your review:
Site of the Day
Babes:
 
User Rating: 56/100 (total: 23 comments)
  • Comment by: walle - Score: 70/100 - Date: 5/18/2014
    pro:
    - tons of HQ content
    - excellent models
    - design and members area state of the art
    cons:
    - no user tags
    - no advanced search (-10)
    suggestion:
    - video thumbnails
  • Comment by: Volte - Score: 93/100 - Date: 1/7/2014
    I don't usually join glam sites but couldn't resist when I saw a preview of Kenze Thomas. I was pleasantly surprised with all the vintage sets in their flashback and amateur categories. I'd rather have weird 80's hair and muff than fake breasts, fake nails, heavy tans, tattoos, piercings, etc... I actually like tan lines.
    I agree with a previous commenter, Joe, that some sets seem a little orangish at times. Too tanned, too red, too something. Like he said, every photographer manages to find a way to ruin the model. Telling a model to act sexy is a surefire way to get bad acting. Translation: closed eyes, tilted head, gaping mouth, and pained look.
    Even if their niche is softcore sets of pornstars, there's enough natural, small-breasted (or at least natural) girl-next-door types mixed in. Admittedly, glam sites aren't my thing, but I still found plenty here worthwhile and reason to rejoin. I much prefer this site to other "Babe" sites like Playboy Plus (too tame) and Twistys (not as sharp res).
  • Comment by: Nik - Score: 100/100 - Date: 12/24/2013
    The site is good. Models are great, photos are very seductive, the pictures quality is perfect, videos are great. I think,, no matter what are your erotic preferences - you will like this site. Highly recommended. :)
  • Comment by: Joe - Score: 50/100 - Date: 5/22/2013
    I gave it a 50 because, the women, posing, and close ups are very sexy. They loose 50 points for grainy, touched up photos, plus they over tan the models or over saturate their skin color to the point it almost looks orange in some cases. Plus they go over board with the makeup. Although I must admit it's hard to find many sites that don't ruin their photos in one way or another. So sad, because the women are so hot.
  • Comment by: mark - Score: 1/100 - Date: 12/28/2011
    The site just kept asking me to reset password. I rebooted my computer cleared browser cache ... did so many things that i never had to do with any other sites. But the site still doesn't work. Waste of money and time.
  • Comment by: Jason Field - Score: 98/100 - Date: 7/25/2011
    Unbelievable quality and seduction.
  • Comment by: what the fuck? - Score: 20/100 - Date: 5/9/2011
    this site is great for navigation. i admit its web design got me interested and i read the reviews below too. the reviews below wasn't that impressing but i decided to join it anyways. and now, i regretted it. the first two videos i watched does not focus much on the vagina. the cameraman focuses more on the boobs itself. u can never watch a vagina for more than 5 secs without the camera scene changing. the girls rub themselves but whats the point of enjoying it for less than 5 secs?
  • Comment by: GSouth - Score: 1/100 - Date: 4/14/2011
    ALERT - Be careful what agreeing too!!
    Just before you join there is a box that says you agree with the terms of service. IF you do not check this - you are kicked off the sign up screen. So the 2nd time I clicked on the "terms of service" box asking for details and were taken back to the very beginning screen. So I called the 800 number who basically said if did not agree do not join -- still without explanation of what these terms of service were. Finally I sent an email to customer service and after 8 days never got an answer so I decided to write the review here. IF join you may be agreeing to anything they want (for example selling your credit card information) since the terms of service you are agreeing to is a secret they are unwilling to share. Be Warned. I never joined as I am unwilling to agree to terms with my credit card number without knowing what those terms are and with a website unwilling after repeated requests to tell me what those terms are. so if you are join they can do anything they want and you agreed to it - because they never shared any information with you.

    Reply from RabbitsReviews (Date:05/05/2011): Thanks for the note. I've spoken with them and it should be fixed shortly!
  • Comment by: Combat_Butler - Score: 50/100 - Date: 11/5/2010
    Damn it! Decent quality videos but I can already tell from the previews that they are all dull. Way too "artsy", Micro Bikini Dancers it ain't.
  • Comment by: Daniel Griffin - Score: 98/100 - Date: 10/29/2010
    It's funny, I've been a member of this site on and off for years and I keep coming back for a reason. I was just reading the two previous comments by Carlton and Troy and really think they've made some good points except in defense of Digital Desire I think it's just all what you're looking for. Yes, the girls are really amazing but the main reason I keep returning for more is that the productions of the stills and videos are better than anyone on the web—period. The web is so saturated with low-quality smut—it's everywhere. To compare Digital Desire to FTV or Twistys is just wrong because it's apples an oranges.
    FTV and Twistys have their place but they don't begin to offer the same experience as Digital Desire. The first thing I thought when I joined their site years back (it was Digital Dreamgirls back then) was that I got the highest quality models anywhere but they also got pretty naughty. The masturbation videos are incredibly sexy, real and well shot. It's kind of like high-end eroticism—and it is truly sexy. Their stuff feels very real and natural yet it's frickin super high end quality. Somehow their models seem so comfortable with everything they do. I also know that they've done a complete rebuild of the sites architecture in the last 6 months and it's very easy to navigate, beautifully done and quite personal. They give great notes on the girls and the shoots as well as a daily staff member check in about whats new and going on. If you're looking for sleazy amateur porn, it's not the place. If you're after Vitoria Secret quality girls doing very naught things this is where you wanna go. I've joined over ten paysites in my day and I keep coming back here. It's not for everybody but it's certainly the best for me.
  • Comment by: troy - Score: 50/100 - Date: 4/1/2010
    Annoying site. Even for $18 I feel like I've wasted my money. The photography and newer videos are excellent quality and the girls are good-looking. However, they are done up in the same way for every shoot, so there is little variation when it comes to physical image. The overabudnance of red lipstick and inches of makeup is pretty annoying in the end. The worst is the videos...it's arty nonsense. The camera angles change every two seconds, the frames merge and re-merge, the slow-mos and colour changes are just infuriating. It's like watching a bad powerpoint presentation. In fact, the videos could actually be classed as a fast moving compilation of still images. Bascially the camera is all over the place, coupled with very heavy editing, leading to a poor experience. The artistic efforts really bring the site down, but if that's what you like you're in for a treat. D/L speeds are good. Digital Desire is not in the same league as FTV for pure babe action.
  • Comment by: Carlton - Score: 20/100 - Date: 3/30/2010
    The good news is the women truly are stunning. Great starting place, huh? Easy to convince yourself you will find something really sexy! So you spend hours and hours going through thousands of pictures--all nude, mind you--and guess what? It's not just boring, it's really, really annoying. Because the photographers at this site don't see the women as sexual. (I'll let you guess why!) The photographers are "artists" and the women are simply art objects. The photographers love asses and shoot them great. They even do a surprisingly good job with breasts. It's vaginas they don't do. They don't want to look at them. They have to shoot them because, well, the girls have them. And they know their customers are interested. But they leave the vaginas closed up tight. Or they shoot them from a distance. Or they shoot them in the dark. Once in a while they shoot an open vagina, but they'll do it disembodied--no girl visible. Sexy? Not if they can help it! Shouldn't the idea of "erotic" photography to pose the models in inviting positions? There are almost no pictures of girls in sexual positions. And the videos are an exercise in pure frustration. Let me mention that I love lingerie and stripping and teasing. And this site does that stuff the best. But without any payoff, what's the point? The videos are almost always shot in the dark, so even if the girl is masturbating or using a dildo, you will not see her vagina except in the briefest glimpses. The girls have no problem showing their stuff--it's the photographers who won't show it. This site is the revenge of the gay guys, taunting all the straight men who have dissed them and wasting their time.
  • Comment by: Hank - Score: 45/100 - Date: 12/29/2009
    Pretty girls, but lousy photography. Cameras fly over, zoom in and out, music blasts. This is more of a erotic music video than porn for straight guys.
  • Comment by: KevinW - Score: 97/100 - Date: 10/28/2009
    Absolutely stunning videos. They feature truly playboy-quality girls (in every video), in beautiful locations (mansions, gardens), professionally slow-dancing seductively, erotically, while removing expensive beautiful, sexy lingerie. The girls, all between 18 and 25 have perfect faces, know how to give sexy glances and never appear bored or stoned. This is quite simply high quality with great effort put into editing the final product (not just a girl in front of a single camcorder like Twistys and other sites). The girls are recorded with say 6-12 cameras and it's all edited into a single scene with clear focus and erotic ambient music. I managed to download almost every video in a month so there is no download limit. Some videos are in good definition, some in excellent HD, averaging 120-240MB in size (6-10 mins). Most of the action is striptease but done very well, with each girl dancing with panties pulled slightly down. All films finish with several minites of masturbation (some toys) and look very real. There is a small amount of lesbian but there is no men on the videos - women this beautiful wouldn't be doing hardcore. If you want to see beautiful women performing THE MOST erotic striptease and masturbating in clear video, this site is the best. Go buy a visa gift-card now.
  • Comment by: Danny Trejo - Score: 95/100 - Date: 10/26/2009
    I've been a long-time fan of Stephen Hicks' style. Its great to see QUALITY photography of females that show elegance and naughty-ness at the same time. Its like a Victoria's Secret catalog with the girls spreading their legs. The photo and video quality is top-notch. I have no idea what some of these other reviewers are talking about.
  • Comment by: DeathKittyBlue - Score: 90/100 - Date: 9/13/2009
    This is one of my favorite porn sites on the internet. If you love softcore, like I do, this site is great. Some of their "daily" content is low quality, but their HD videos and Hi-Res photos are amazing.
  • Comment by: Johnchurn - Score: 20/100 - Date: 8/10/2009
    Babes are damn hot & sexy but the pics quality is bad for today's standard.
    Video are really clear & crisp but its darn boring.
  • Comment by: mort - Score: 20/100 - Date: 6/17/2009
    Most videos way too "arty" to qualify as worthwhile porn. Poor camera angles, mediocre lighting, and too much softcore content. Definitely not worth it.
  • Comment by: This site needs alot of vids - Score: 5/100 - Date: 5/20/2009
    Seeing how many models they bring they need to increase the amount of vids they post, if you like pics, thats ok, but welcome to today where we have videos, which are 10x better than pictures.
  • Comment by: kit - Score: 50/100 - Date: 5/16/2009
    Horrible photo quality. Hi res yes but the subjects are out of focus so it doesn't matter if you have 3000 pixels or 100. Hard to believe the photos were taken by professional. What a waste of time, money and hard drive space. What a shame. Cancelled 10 minutes after joining.
  • Comment by: scott - Score: 70/100 - Date: 4/16/2009
    Signed up and cancelled right away... was worse than cinemax
  • Comment by: bruce - Score: 80/100 - Date: 12/10/2008
    it s great site for me, pretty girls and nice photo shot. But the quality may vary from the old contents(lower quality)
  • Comment by: Razor - Score: 60/100 - Date: 11/19/2008
    Sorry, too many old pics that are sold as new ones. Saw most of that stuff years ago alreday.
Price:
 Discount $14.99/30 days (Reg. $19.94 )
$39.99/90 days
$94.99/365 days
Cross Sales: 1 pre-checked
Content
Pic sets: 2916+ Pics per set: 55 Zip sets: Yes
Pic Res: 3000x2000 High Res: Yes
Number of movies: 1133+ HD Porn: Yes Streaming: Yes
Average Length: 10 mins Full length videos: Yes Download Limits: No
 
Video Formats: Windows (1280x720; 3200k)
MOV (960x540; 1660k)
AVI (1280x720; 3645k)
Flash (960x544; 1529k)
MP4 (1920x1080; 6084k)
MP4 (streaming)
Preview DigitalDesire.com members area
Support
Independent Biller(s): DHD Media, Epoch
Customer Service: 1-800-935-5771
support@digitaldesire.com


Pros & Cons
pros -exclusive content
-many Full HD videos
-frequent video updates
cons -no bonus sites
-no model bios
-no advanced search
Main Category: Babes Porn
Updated on: 7/15/2014 07/15/2014- From 83 to 84: More content. -A.K.
11/02/2013- From 82 to 83: More content. -Chris
05/23/2013- Stays at 82. -A.K.
05/30/2012- Stays at 82. -Adam
11/06/2011- From 93 to 82: Scores adjusted to new standards. -April
11/13/2010- Stays at 93. -Wayne
03/31/2010- From 94 to 93: Content amount score adjusted to current standard. -Will
07/15/2009- Stays at 94. -Bryce
04/21/2008- Stays at 94. -Rabbit
- Initial review: 7/20/2007
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Send to Reddit Send to StumbleUpon Email More...