Visit Digital Desire

Latest Update

Update Notes

Updated on: 05/31/2016

Will Peters 

By: Will Peters
Number of Reviews: 1384
Average Score: 65

Since we last visited DigitalDesire...

  • You'll find 70 more videos and close to 100 more photo sets. A new video is added two or three times a week, with photo sets in between.

Full Review

Some desires are considered universal. For example, we all want love and acceptance. I also think many of us crave seeing naked babes who are exceptionally hot so that we can fantasize about them loving us and accepting our advances. Assuming you're also into that groove, the beautiful photography and videography on Digital Desire is definitely for you.

I should mention that originally well-known glamour photographer J. Stephen Hicks was an integral part of the success of DigitalDesire. And though his work continues to help the site succeed at being one of the best out there, he passed away in 2013 and other photographers now produce high-quality work in the spirit of what Mr. Hicks shot.

One of the best things about the site is that it gives you 1,370 videos, which is a pretty sweet amount. You'll find that many offer high-def playback and the most recent ones are in Full HD. The older material is good too, so no worries there.

The flicks are pretty much all solo, with plenty of nudity and lots of gentle pussy play. They're beautifully shot as well as artistic, with music playing in the background. Fortunately, the music doesn't always drown out the moaning. I can still hear myself clearly - just a little joke, but it's funny because it's true.

There's also some toy play as well as very alluring lesbian shoots. I mean, these are some of the most beautiful chicks you'll ever see, so two of them together is going to blow your mind. Rihanna Rimes will earn lots of points from you as you watch her finger her tight muff on a bed.

There are also 3,266 photo sets and they can all be downloaded in Zip files and viewed in automatic slideshows. Many of them come with high-res shots. Again, these models are gorgeous, with stunning bodies, and the photographers are clearly not amateurs. They know what they're doing and provide some great shots of the girls in all their glory. You'll find lesbian and masturbation pics as well. Check out Malena Morgan and Hayden Hawkens. You'll be glad you did.

New movies get added to the site at least two or three times a week and photos get posted on the days in between, so you're getting new content almost every single day. There's a members' forum that you can keep busy with and a blog as well. Feel free to post comments, leave a rating, save a scene to your favorites, or use keyword tags or sorting options.

Digital Desire is a gorgeous site with gorgeous models doing gorgeous things. If you love lovely ladies you should give the site a try. An advanced search engine would be nice, though, and having some bios would help you get to know these stunning babes more.

Member Area Screenshots

  • Screenshot 1
  • Screenshot 2
  • Screenshot 3
  • Screenshot 4

Write Your Review

* Please include a pro and a con about the site. Balance is essential in making a comment worthwhile. Scores without comments will be deleted.

* Watch out for ratings of zero and 100. In our opinion, there is no such thing as a site that is absolutely perfect or completely worthless.

Remaining characters:  

Latest Comments

  • Comment by: Anonymous

    Score: 40% Date: 03/23/2016

    I was completely unimpressed by the supposed HD quality of the videos here. Perhaps I've looked at BabesNetwork and RealityKings for too long. I signed up yesterday with the Rabbit Reviews discount. Any chance I can get a refund? I don't think I'll really make much use out of the site.
    Reply from RabbitsReviews (Date:03/24/2016): Hello. We don't offer a Money Back Guarantee with this site.

  • Comment by: Drew

    Score: 75% Date: 12/29/2015

    In porn, why is it standard practice or considered sexy to block a woman’s pussy from the camera’s (and subsequently, my) view? Is it a tease? We get frustratingly few extended shots of the open leg, open pussy in soft- and hard-core porn alike. As soon as the viewer thinks he/she is going to get the golden look, something (a hand or toy) gets thrown in the way, or the camera moves elsewhere. The conundrum seems odd, because the woman’s pussy is a man’s number one reason to watch porn, number one reason to LIVE!, and wouldn’t we want to spend more time gazing at that delectable, mouth-watering snatch? It isn't the models' fault. They love getting naked and they love showing us everything. It's the men that THINK they know what we want, but they DON'T!!! Editors, directors and videographers, fall astonishingly short when it comes to getting us the most intimate look at our most "Desired" woman part, and Digital Desire leads the way.

  • Comment by: VS1212

    Score: 5% Date: 12/17/2015

    Pros: Very artistic and beautiful

    Cons: It is 100% responsible for totally messing up my comp. I only downloaded 10 or so files and my main drive started to fail almost immediately and I could not access any data. Luckily, a repair with checkdisk and a format saved my SSD, but it irreversibly damaged my Hard Drive, and corrupted my Operating system. I don't think it was malware, just corrupted files that caused the damage. While I was a member a few years back and loved the content, I will never be going back.

  • Comment by: george37

    Score: 75% Date: 02/19/2015

    Mostly recycled material from other sources. Lots of "vintage" stuff. Disappointed

  • Comment by: walle

    Score: 70% Date: 05/18/2014

    - tons of HQ content
    - excellent models
    - design and members area state of the art
    - no user tags
    - no advanced search (-10)
    - video thumbnails

  • Comment by: Volte

    Score: 93% Date: 01/07/2014

    I don't usually join glam sites but couldn't resist when I saw a preview of Kenze Thomas. I was pleasantly surprised with all the vintage sets in their flashback and amateur categories. I'd rather have weird 80's hair and muff than fake breasts, fake nails, heavy tans, tattoos, piercings, etc... I actually like tan lines.
    I agree with a previous commenter, Joe, that some sets seem a little orangish at times. Too tanned, too red, too something. Like he said, every photographer manages to find a way to ruin the model. Telling a model to act sexy is a surefire way to get bad acting. Translation: closed eyes, tilted head, gaping mouth, and pained look.
    Even if their niche is softcore sets of pornstars, there's enough natural, small-breasted (or at least natural) girl-next-door types mixed in. Admittedly, glam sites aren't my thing, but I still found plenty here worthwhile and reason to rejoin. I much prefer this site to other "Babe" sites like Playboy Plus (too tame) and Twistys (not as sharp res).

  • Comment by: Nik

    Score: 100% Date: 12/24/2013

    The site is good. Models are great, photos are very seductive, the pictures quality is perfect, videos are great. I think,, no matter what are your erotic preferences - you will like this site. Highly recommended. :)

  • Comment by: Joe

    Score: 50% Date: 05/22/2013

    I gave it a 50 because, the women, posing, and close ups are very sexy. They loose 50 points for grainy, touched up photos, plus they over tan the models or over saturate their skin color to the point it almost looks orange in some cases. Plus they go over board with the makeup. Although I must admit it's hard to find many sites that don't ruin their photos in one way or another. So sad, because the women are so hot.

  • Comment by: mark

    Score: 1% Date: 12/28/2011

    The site just kept asking me to reset password. I rebooted my computer cleared browser cache ... did so many things that i never had to do with any other sites. But the site still doesn't work. Waste of money and time.

  • Comment by: Jason Field

    Score: 98% Date: 07/25/2011

    Unbelievable quality and seduction.

  • Comment by: what the fuck?

    Score: 20% Date: 05/09/2011

    this site is great for navigation. i admit its web design got me interested and i read the reviews below too. the reviews below wasn't that impressing but i decided to join it anyways. and now, i regretted it. the first two videos i watched does not focus much on the vagina. the cameraman focuses more on the boobs itself. u can never watch a vagina for more than 5 secs without the camera scene changing. the girls rub themselves but whats the point of enjoying it for less than 5 secs?

  • Comment by: GSouth

    Score: 1% Date: 04/14/2011

    ALERT - Be careful what agreeing too!!
    Just before you join there is a box that says you agree with the terms of service. IF you do not check this - you are kicked off the sign up screen. So the 2nd time I clicked on the "terms of service" box asking for details and were taken back to the very beginning screen. So I called the 800 number who basically said if did not agree do not join -- still without explanation of what these terms of service were. Finally I sent an email to customer service and after 8 days never got an answer so I decided to write the review here. IF join you may be agreeing to anything they want (for example selling your credit card information) since the terms of service you are agreeing to is a secret they are unwilling to share. Be Warned. I never joined as I am unwilling to agree to terms with my credit card number without knowing what those terms are and with a website unwilling after repeated requests to tell me what those terms are. so if you are join they can do anything they want and you agreed to it - because they never shared any information with you.

    Reply from RabbitsReviews (Date:05/05/2011): Thanks for the note. I've spoken with them and it should be fixed shortly!

  • Comment by: Combat_Butler

    Score: 50% Date: 11/05/2010

    Damn it! Decent quality videos but I can already tell from the previews that they are all dull. Way too "artsy", Micro Bikini Dancers it ain't.

  • Comment by: Daniel Griffin

    Score: 98% Date: 10/29/2010

    It's funny, I've been a member of this site on and off for years and I keep coming back for a reason. I was just reading the two previous comments by Carlton and Troy and really think they've made some good points except in defense of Digital Desire I think it's just all what you're looking for. Yes, the girls are really amazing but the main reason I keep returning for more is that the productions of the stills and videos are better than anyone on the web—period. The web is so saturated with low-quality smut—it's everywhere. To compare Digital Desire to FTV or Twistys is just wrong because it's apples an oranges.
    FTV and Twistys have their place but they don't begin to offer the same experience as Digital Desire. The first thing I thought when I joined their site years back (it was Digital Dreamgirls back then) was that I got the highest quality models anywhere but they also got pretty naughty. The masturbation videos are incredibly sexy, real and well shot. It's kind of like high-end eroticism—and it is truly sexy. Their stuff feels very real and natural yet it's frickin super high end quality. Somehow their models seem so comfortable with everything they do. I also know that they've done a complete rebuild of the sites architecture in the last 6 months and it's very easy to navigate, beautifully done and quite personal. They give great notes on the girls and the shoots as well as a daily staff member check in about whats new and going on. If you're looking for sleazy amateur porn, it's not the place. If you're after Vitoria Secret quality girls doing very naught things this is where you wanna go. I've joined over ten paysites in my day and I keep coming back here. It's not for everybody but it's certainly the best for me.

  • Comment by: troy

    Score: 50% Date: 04/01/2010

    Annoying site. Even for $18 I feel like I've wasted my money. The photography and newer videos are excellent quality and the girls are good-looking. However, they are done up in the same way for every shoot, so there is little variation when it comes to physical image. The overabudnance of red lipstick and inches of makeup is pretty annoying in the end. The worst is the's arty nonsense. The camera angles change every two seconds, the frames merge and re-merge, the slow-mos and colour changes are just infuriating. It's like watching a bad powerpoint presentation. In fact, the videos could actually be classed as a fast moving compilation of still images. Bascially the camera is all over the place, coupled with very heavy editing, leading to a poor experience. The artistic efforts really bring the site down, but if that's what you like you're in for a treat. D/L speeds are good. Digital Desire is not in the same league as FTV for pure babe action.

  • Comment by: Carlton

    Score: 20% Date: 03/30/2010

    The good news is the women truly are stunning. Great starting place, huh? Easy to convince yourself you will find something really sexy! So you spend hours and hours going through thousands of pictures--all nude, mind you--and guess what? It's not just boring, it's really, really annoying. Because the photographers at this site don't see the women as sexual. (I'll let you guess why!) The photographers are "artists" and the women are simply art objects. The photographers love asses and shoot them great. They even do a surprisingly good job with breasts. It's vaginas they don't do. They don't want to look at them. They have to shoot them because, well, the girls have them. And they know their customers are interested. But they leave the vaginas closed up tight. Or they shoot them from a distance. Or they shoot them in the dark. Once in a while they shoot an open vagina, but they'll do it disembodied--no girl visible. Sexy? Not if they can help it! Shouldn't the idea of "erotic" photography to pose the models in inviting positions? There are almost no pictures of girls in sexual positions. And the videos are an exercise in pure frustration. Let me mention that I love lingerie and stripping and teasing. And this site does that stuff the best. But without any payoff, what's the point? The videos are almost always shot in the dark, so even if the girl is masturbating or using a dildo, you will not see her vagina except in the briefest glimpses. The girls have no problem showing their stuff--it's the photographers who won't show it. This site is the revenge of the gay guys, taunting all the straight men who have dissed them and wasting their time.

  • Comment by: Hank

    Score: 45% Date: 12/29/2009

    Pretty girls, but lousy photography. Cameras fly over, zoom in and out, music blasts. This is more of a erotic music video than porn for straight guys.

  • Comment by: KevinW

    Score: 97% Date: 10/28/2009

    Absolutely stunning videos. They feature truly playboy-quality girls (in every video), in beautiful locations (mansions, gardens), professionally slow-dancing seductively, erotically, while removing expensive beautiful, sexy lingerie. The girls, all between 18 and 25 have perfect faces, know how to give sexy glances and never appear bored or stoned. This is quite simply high quality with great effort put into editing the final product (not just a girl in front of a single camcorder like Twistys and other sites). The girls are recorded with say 6-12 cameras and it's all edited into a single scene with clear focus and erotic ambient music. I managed to download almost every video in a month so there is no download limit. Some videos are in good definition, some in excellent HD, averaging 120-240MB in size (6-10 mins). Most of the action is striptease but done very well, with each girl dancing with panties pulled slightly down. All films finish with several minites of masturbation (some toys) and look very real. There is a small amount of lesbian but there is no men on the videos - women this beautiful wouldn't be doing hardcore. If you want to see beautiful women performing THE MOST erotic striptease and masturbating in clear video, this site is the best. Go buy a visa gift-card now.

  • Comment by: Danny Trejo

    Score: 95% Date: 10/26/2009

    I've been a long-time fan of Stephen Hicks' style. Its great to see QUALITY photography of females that show elegance and naughty-ness at the same time. Its like a Victoria's Secret catalog with the girls spreading their legs. The photo and video quality is top-notch. I have no idea what some of these other reviewers are talking about.

  • Comment by: DeathKittyBlue

    Score: 90% Date: 09/13/2009

    This is one of my favorite porn sites on the internet. If you love softcore, like I do, this site is great. Some of their "daily" content is low quality, but their HD videos and Hi-Res photos are amazing.

  • Comment by: Johnchurn

    Score: 20% Date: 08/10/2009

    Babes are damn hot & sexy but the pics quality is bad for today's standard.
    Video are really clear & crisp but its darn boring.

  • Comment by: mort

    Score: 20% Date: 06/17/2009

    Most videos way too "arty" to qualify as worthwhile porn. Poor camera angles, mediocre lighting, and too much softcore content. Definitely not worth it.

  • Comment by: This site needs alot of vids

    Score: 5% Date: 05/20/2009

    Seeing how many models they bring they need to increase the amount of vids they post, if you like pics, thats ok, but welcome to today where we have videos, which are 10x better than pictures.

  • Comment by: kit

    Score: 50% Date: 05/16/2009

    Horrible photo quality. Hi res yes but the subjects are out of focus so it doesn't matter if you have 3000 pixels or 100. Hard to believe the photos were taken by professional. What a waste of time, money and hard drive space. What a shame. Cancelled 10 minutes after joining.

  • Comment by: scott

    Score: 70% Date: 04/16/2009

    Signed up and cancelled right away... was worse than cinemax

  • Comment by: bruce

    Score: 80% Date: 12/10/2008

    it s great site for me, pretty girls and nice photo shot. But the quality may vary from the old contents(lower quality)

  • Comment by: Razor

    Score: 60% Date: 11/19/2008

    Sorry, too many old pics that are sold as new ones. Saw most of that stuff years ago alreday.