If you're not completely satisfied within three days of joining this site, email us and we'll ensure you get your money back! (Note: Does not apply to accepted cross sales)
This site is scored based on photo content—not video!
I wasn't quite sure what to expect from Rodox, but the moment I entered the URL into my browser and the tour popped up, I realized I was in for some fine vintage smut. It's the kind of fun, classic porn that historians will enjoy a great deal.
Rodox is a Danish magazine that's been around for 40 years. This piqued my curiosity because I love looking at how porn has progressed over time. Going into the site, I only had one expectation and that was to find hundreds of photos.
The design is relatively simple and amateur for a magazine site, but navigation could be much better. There isn't a search engine, so you'll have to use the menu, which has links to the 10 photo categories. Clicking on a category brings up multiple pages of side-by-side thumbnails, each representing a photo set.
There is no pagination other than using the arrow below the menu to go back one page or forward one page. There is no filter option and no content tags either. You'll see "live chat" and "teen cinema" links and these take you to other sites that you have to spend extra cash on. The "retro cinema" link takes you to one of the bonus sites, which I will get to in a moment.
There are 1,341 sets of photos when you combine everything, with anywhere from 15 to 30 images each. Many of the pics are high-res shots. They aren't super crisp, but then I imagine that most of them have been scanned and formatted for digital delivery since they're from old issues.
Taking this into consideration, the photos are pretty clear. They certainly look dated when it comes to the clothes, hairstyles and mostly hairy pussies. You can view them online with a minimal amount of scrolling since they almost fit the screen. Sadly, you can't download the galleries in Zip files.
The collection isn't dated, but the homepage has the date of the last update and the next one. And based on that, it looks like they last updated back in April 2013. Since this is a magazine, it's all about the photos and there aren't any videos. The niches are rather extensive and some of the themes include anal sex, bizarre sex, lesbian, schoolgirls and golden oldies.
There are some great anal and hardcore close-ups and good cumshot pics. Settings vary, but expect most to be indoors and occasionally you'll come across some swinger-type photos. While there are babes with shaved pussies, there are also many with full bushes, which will certainly appeal to horny hirsute enthusiasts.
For those who love to reminisce or just happen to enjoy porn from an era gone by, where the pussy was furry and the hair was big, Rodox is packed with photos. Those looking for retro movies will need to look elsewhere. Thankfully, elsewhere is the two bonus sites Retro Raw and Vintage Classic Porn.
|By: Chris Parker|
|Number of Reviews: 1151|
|Average Score: 64.3|
|Cross Sales: 1 pre-checked|
|Pic sets: 1341+||Pics per set: 20||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: 1024x768||High Res: Yes|
|Number of movies: N/A+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: No|
|Average Length: 0 mins||Full length videos: No||Download Limits: No
|Independent Biller(s):||VXS Billing|
Pros & Cons
-mostly exclusive content
-many high-res photos
-no zipped photo sets
-no recent updates
-some navigational issues
08/28/2013- From 59 to 57: No recent updates. -Chris
01/01/2013- From 57 to 59: More content and improved quality. -April
06/15/2012- From 63 to 57: Usability score adjustments. -A.K.
10/14/2011- From 66 to 63: Scores adjusted to new criteria. -Chris
04/19/2011- Stays at 66. -Chris
09/20/2010- From 63 to 66: More content. -A.K.
02/14/2010- Stays at 63. -Charlie
06/11/2009- Stays at 63. -Giraffe
08/12/2008- From 69 to 63: Expensive, adjusted score to new criteria. -Peacock - Initial review: 12/13/2006