We no longer link to this site.
Freaky Granny combines some main nonexclusive content with some mega-site style extras in diverse hardcore categories. Although it is a member of a larger network of similar sites, it isn't exactly replicating its sister sites in either setup or quality. That might sound as if that could be a good thing, but in actuality the site first appears not to be as good as some of the others, so it's more of a minus than a plus in the beginning until you delve at bit deeper.
There are 27 videos of mature action featured on the homepage. The term FreakyGranny might not be so far off the mark, since the ladies are definitely not less aged chicks passing for older, they look to be in their fifties or even in some cases sixties with bad dye jobs and too much makeup. Each session comes with a set of mediocre video captures and a video downloadable in about eight parts. They play in excellent-quality MPEGs.
At the top of the homepage are links labeled photos and videos, each offers a link to even more content that is mature related and it's here that I discovered better quality stuff. I found 27 galleries of average-looking photos. Some of them feature solo old pussy while many involve hags being bagged by young studs.
Especially since this site isn't updating, the bonus features are really what make it worth thinking about. The good news is that you do get access to a ton of reality sites and other extras. In the end, once you find the better quality middle-aged muff films and pictures, the Freaky Granny membership seems worth considering.
|By: Will Peters|
|Number of Reviews: 1487|
|Average Score: 63.9|
|$2.83/3 days, rebills at $34.82|
|Cross Sales: 1 pre-checked|
|Pic sets: N/A||Pics per set: N/A||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: 27+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: No|
|Average Length: 18 mins||Full length videos: No||Download Limits: No
MPEG (352x240; 2000k)
Pros & Cons
-bonus site access
-no zipped photo sets
09/13/2008- From 70 to 75: No longer updating and some content removed, but is now exclusive and of better quality. -Marmot - Initial review: 1/30/2006