This review is outdated. Information may be inaccurate.
GiantGayCocks has 53 videos. There were none last time, so this is definitely an improvement. However, most of them appear to be nonexclusive. The good news is that most of it also looks great and comes with a streaming and good-quality download option. Some are reality scenes, some are scripted scenes and other are gonzo. Also, while most are hardcore, there are solo jerk-off scenes as well.
You also get seven gay bonus sites, like Gay Hitchhiker (although you will find overlap among them). They also mix solo and hardcore action. They have musclemen, smooth-skinned fresh faces, ebony studs and more. But back to the main collection.
There are 135 galleries that feature a range of sizes, from what I'd call somewhat average-sized dicks to some that did appear to hit the "large" button. Still, I'm not sure why you would call a site something that promises big dicks and then not deliver at all times. At least the picture quality is great and there are more cocks to judge and admire now than the last time we were here.
This expanding of the content has made it something to consider - whereas before it was not even worth talking about. The monthly membership is in the average range and the site is now at a point where it could be justified. All the same, there is no update schedule and the collection isn't dated, so our assumption of weekly updates might not hold up for long. Giant Gay Cocks leaves you feeling better than it used to, but for really big dicks and exclusive content it wouldn't be the place to go.
|By: Zoe Roark|
|Number of Reviews: 187|
|Average Score: 66.4|
|Limited Trial $1.85/3 days, rebills at $39.98|
|Cross Sales: 1 pre-checked|
|Pic sets: 135+||Pics per set: 50||Zip sets: Yes|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: 53+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: Yes|
|Average Length: 20 mins||Full length videos: Yes||Download Limits: No
Windows (1280x720; 1900k)
MP4 (960x540; 2000k)
|Independent Biller(s):||Epoch, CCBill|
Pros & Cons
-zipped photo sets
-mostly nonexclusive content
-pics aren't high-res
-expensive trial rebill
01/24/2009- From 42 to 43: Large gaps between updates. -Groundhog
05/16/2008- From 54 to 42: Quality adjusted to current standard, no updates, content amount reduced. -Groundhog - Initial review: 6/19/2005