Amateur Straight Guys Fondled Review

Here we go again, another gay site starring "heteros." This one is called Amateur Straight Guys Fondled. Overall, my biggest problem with these straight model sites is that too often I am expected to sacrifice my standards for quality for the privilege of seeing a supposedly heterosexual man naked.

For some true voyeurs perhaps blurry images enhance the sensation of secretly spying on someone. For me, it simply seems like a waste of my time and money, especially when it's obvious the models know that they're being filmed.

For instance, I appreciate the scenes on AmateurStraightGuysFondled where the fondling is actually more of a tugjob. However, even though many straight dudes might let you touch their dicks for a buck or two, going further than that on film (even if it is grainy and unclear) puts my belief in their heterosexuality to the test.

There are 468 vids lasting two to five minutes on average. They give you varying quality and playback is poor to good looking. They have definitely improved movie files since launching the site, but they're no spectacular.

Currently, there are 81 dudes on the site. There is no denying that each is hot in a hairless and slender or slightly jock sort of way. It certainly didn't hurt me to see any of these men naked, but I would have preferred to see their nudity with a little more clarity.

There are actually more sets of vid caps than there are videos. The guy who created the site never seems to use an actual photo camera for pics, but simply uses a video one even if he doesn't bother to post the accompanying flick.

The cost of membership is comparable to other sites, but because only some content is of good quality, it doesn't seem competitive. Although some may appreciate the cheesy camera shots from inside a cardboard box or underneath a towel that give that spy cam feel since we see the fellow being openly fondled while he "sleeps," I find there is no excuse for poor quality clips or images since the supposedly clandestine filming is obviously a ruse.