Here we go again another gay site starring "heteros" this one is called, Amateur Straight Guys Fondled. Overall, my biggest problem with all these straight boy sites is that too often for the mere privilege of seeing a supposedly heterosexual man naked I am expected to sacrifice my standards as far as quality goes. For some true voyeurs perhaps blurry images enhance the sensation of secretly spying on someone.

For me, it simply seems like a waste of my time and money especially when it's obvious the models know that they're being filmed. For instance, I appreciate the scenes where the fondling is actually more of a hand job. However, although many straight dudes might let you touch their dicks for a deuce going further than that on film even if it is grainy and unclear puts my belief in their heterosexuality to the test.

Currently, there are 54 boys on AmateurStraightGuysFondled. There is no denying that each one is hot in a hairless and slender or slightly more jock sort of way. It certainly didn't hurt me to see any of these men naked but I would have preferred to see their nudity with a little more clarity.

The nearly 200 image galleries consisted of small low quality still photos. They almost have a video capture level of color and resolution but are not blurred by movement like screen captures would be. Besides, when you see the videos you'll understand that they couldn't be freeze-frames from those clips since the pictures are much better than the filmed footage.

Amateur Straight Guys Fondled has just over 200 clips lasting 1-4 minutes the majority, download in mediocre quality Windows Media format (252x192, 250kbps) or worse. Except some random sets of clips are inexplicably in better quality QuickTime (320x240, 633kbps). I found at least two or three such exceptions and there really is no obvious rhyme or reason to why nor do they seem to represent any trend towards improvement in the quality of future updates.

The AmateurStraightGuysFondled membership rate is less than average and highly competitive but still seems steep based on the quality offered. Although some may appreciate the cheesy camera shots from inside a cardboard box or underneath a towel that give that spy cam feel since we see the fellow being openly fondled well he "sleeps" in the next shot, I find there is no excuse for poor quality clips or images since the supposedly clandestine filming is seemingly a ruse.