This site is closed.
As far as a specific gallery count, I found no way to give a definite number since browsing or searching is done by model type and you end up with a set of profile pages that list both clips and pictures. Nevertheless, there are 132 guys, each having at least one gallery and many having three or four. The photos are only regular-resolution and whether they're shot during a video shoot or only as a photo spread the quality is merely average.
The number of video clips was easier to calculate, although again it's an estimate not an exact figure. One can browse content based upon sex type as in anal, oral, rimming, outdoor, etc. Add each category together and you find there are 676 mediocre streaming clips, assuming about four per set that works out to about 169 full-length scenes. Unfortunately, besides the streaming-only issue, the quality is low in RealPlayer (320x240, 432kbps), QuickTime (320x240, 51kbps) and Windows Media format (320x240, 448kbps).
Once again, I am faced with the typical dilemma, hot guys in a load of hot content but quality so low in most cases that my enjoyment is thoroughly compromised. The medium cost of membership is almost tempting but alas, I know that one can find better quality twink content elsewhere for the same price, so it's a no-go.
|By: Will Peters|
|Number of Reviews: 1486|
|Average Score: 64.1|
|Cross Sales: N/A|
|Pic sets: 396+||Pics per set: 20||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: 169+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: Yes|
|Average Length: 20 mins||Full length videos: No||Download Limits: N/A
Windows (320x240; 448k; streaming)
MOV (320x240; 51k; streaming)
RM (320x240; 432k; streaming)
Pros & Cons
-large amount of content
-low-quality streaming-only video