Porn ReviewsSpecialsAdult PersonalsPorn TrialsPorn BlogSearchBookmark
Review
Heads Up!
This review is outdated. Information may be inaccurate.

Some sites have an amateur feel without necessarily coming across as being amateur. I suppose that for some that defeats the purpose of calling a site "amateur" and to those skeptics who like their amateur porn to appear truly homemade and low-tech, I suggest visiting Shannons Handjobs.

ShannonsHandjobs is a production of Bob Co, a name that, for me, already conjures up images of infomercials selling home rotisserie ovens and spray-on hair. Shannon's particular consumer goods are available straight to the buyer, but are not exactly the things you'd proudly show off to your family and co-workers - unless of course they are perverts who are into watching a pretty young chick jacking off various dudes.

There are 281 videos, each offering a full-length file that's downloadable in Windows Media format. Many are in high-def, but the older movies only provide you with average-quality playback. The videos generally last from two to nine minutes, but a bunch of the older movies are as long as 12 minutes. You could think of the studs in these vids as "three pump chumps."

After reading the playback stats, you might ask what did I mean before when I said the site is truly an amateur production? Well, they seem to be filmed in Shannon's house. You'll see the dirty laundry in the hamper and the stack of old newspapers on the coffee table. Each clip is acceptably lit, but they definitely have that sometimes orangey, sometimes gray, shot-inside-a-house look.

Although Shannon is hot, the guys are not. I don't just mean in the "I'm not into guys" way, they honestly are the most average set of dudes imaginable. All those stark white legs and chubby beer guts can be a little distracting. It enforces the reality of it all though.

The babe keeps the figurative spotlight on herself at all times. In some scenes, she makes a point of calling the guys mean names and taking an almost dominating position. You can check out vid caps of some of her scenes and even buy DVDs if you want a permanent record of her dexterous digits.

There aren't any search functions besides a pagination feature, so you have lots of scrolling as your only real means of navigation. Still, it's easy enough to find everything and the design, while kind of amateurish, isn't exactly ugly, either.

Shannons Handjobs definitely gives any man the chance to imagine having a friend around who will jerk him off with little ceremony whenever he wants. The asking price definitely matches what you get, even though there are no bonus sites and older content is taken down as new scenes get added. Despite its faults, this site is worth checking out.

By:
Number of Reviews: 1483
Average Score: 63.9

Contact Rabbit
Write your review:
Site of the Day
Handjobs:
 
User Rating: 45/100 (total: 1 comment)
  • Comment by: Dirty Bird - Score: 45/100 - Date: 8/5/2009
    I've seen clips of her before but she is boring & at times lifeless I had to rank this site low because of the poor camera angles they need a third person for the close ups so you don't miss the cum shot.... There are better sites
Price:
$2.95/2 days, rebills at $14.95
$18.95/30 days, rebills at $17.95
$39.95/90 days
Cross Sales: 2 unchecked
Content
Pic sets: N/A Pics per set: N/A Zip sets: No
Pic Res: N/A High Res: No
Number of movies: 281+ HD Porn: Yes Streaming: No
Average Length: 6 mins Full length videos: Yes Download Limits: No
 
Video Formats: Windows (1280x720; 2048k)
Preview ShannonsHandjobs.com members area
Support
Independent Biller(s): CCBill
Customer Service: bobcohj@hotmail.com


Pros & Cons
pros -high-def videos
-exclusive content
-reasonably priced
cons -no bonus sites
-only vid caps
-new content replaces old content
Main Category: Handjobs Porn
Updated on: 9/3/2012 09/03/2012- From 77 to 63: Scores adjusted to current criteria. -Adam
05/26/2011- Stays at 77. -April
10/21/2010- From 79 to 77: Less frequent updates. -April
11/12/2009- From 78 to 79: Content quality improved. -Penelope
09/15/2008- From 77 to 78: Quality score lowered to reflect current criteria, but content added. -Marmot
- Initial review: 3/6/2006
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Send to Reddit Send to StumbleUpon Email More...