This review is outdated. Information may be inaccurate.
If you're a fan of seeing beautiful faces being blasted with jizz, you probably already know that there are a lot of good facial sites out there. Unfortunately, Fresh Facials isn't one of them.
So far, there are 11 hardcore suck and fuck videos and 16 photo galleries available at FreshFacials. Each of the vids and all of the galleries end with a big sticky facial and while that's enjoyable and all, there just isn't enough content to keep anyone happy for very long. That problem is made worse by the fact that updates have apparently ceased and the quality of the movies is pretty poor.
Even though the vids can be streamed and downloaded in both Windows Media and QuickTime format, all the flicks offer mediocre-quality playback. The flicks look so bad that I almost wasn't able to enjoy the fucking or the facials.
In fact, in the first episode I checked out, I saw a guy jerking off onto a gorgeous gal's face, but the quality was so crappy that I couldn't see his load bust out or land on her lips. I only realized that the money shot had been delivered because the dude stopped jerking and relaxed.
The only reason to consider joining the site is the bonus content. In addition to the main stuff, members get access to video feeds, links to live cams, games, jokes and a whole lot of bonus sites, including Anal Hell, Busty Solos and Simple Fucks. A number of these sites are quite good because they come with HD vids.
Fresh Facials really isn't very impressive and it probably isn't worth joining on its own. That said, if the bonus stuff sounds interesting to you, it might be worth checking out.
|By: A.K. Anderson|
|Number of Reviews: 1425|
|Average Score: 64.2|
|Limited Trial $1.85/3 days, rebills at $39.98|
|Cross Sales: 1 pre-checked|
|Pic sets: 16+||Pics per set: 85||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: Yes|
|Number of movies: 11+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: Yes|
|Average Length: 20 mins||Full length videos: No||Download Limits: No
Windows (320x240; 271k; streaming)
MOV (320x240; 300k; streaming)
|Independent Biller(s):||Epoch, CCBill|
Pros & Cons
-minimal main content
05/16/2009- From 64 to 62: Quality score adjusted to reflect current standards, updates stopped. -Sloth
09/25/2008- From 66 to 64: Quality and Amount scores adjusted to reflect current standards. -Sloth
12/19/2007- From 65 to 66: price score increased and some new content was added. -Marmot - Initial review: 1/13/2006