Porn ReviewsSpecialsAdult PersonalsPorn TrialsPorn BlogSearchBookmark
Phil Flash Video

Heads Up!
This review is outdated. Information may be inaccurate.

Have you ever heard of Next Door Nikki or Megan QT? Well, if you have, then you probably know who Phil Flash is. If you haven't heard of these cuties and you're a fan of non-nude sites, then you should check them out. The same goes for those who like seeing bare breasts and masturbation, because they have changed the focus of the site to include that kind of material as well.

I have reviewed a bunch of PhilFlash sites and I have to say that this man knows what he's doing when it comes to sexy softcore babes. His chicks range from unbelievably cute to fucking gorgeous. Plus, not only is the content softcore and mostly non-nude, but also these hotties sure know how to tease you with their barely clothed, nubile bodies.

The site is very confusing at first, on account of there being lots of writing and multiple sections. There is no primary video or photo section. Instead, you have to browse every model's bio page, as well as check out the candids, club P-F (pics Phil took of amateurs while hitting up the nightclubs), nude's a-poppin' (a striptease event) and a section called "The Stash" (which seems to be his private collection). In total, I counted 643 videos and 1,299 sets of pictures.

They strongly recommend only viewing the site in Firefox and I'll have to agree. Since it's not really integrated for any other browser, opening up a photo gallery makes the navigation on the left of each page become superimposed on top of a bunch of images. When viewed in Firefox, these issues are gone, but you still have ads all over the place, on top of what's left looking pretty amateur.

The pictures look okay and the videos are all downloadable. Quality varies a bit when it comes to both, but there are some great-quality Windows Media files to be enjoyed, as well as a bunch of super high-res picture sets. There are a few other video formats of varying qualities to look at, depending on the scene, as well as clip downloads instead of full-length files. A few models also have archived cam sessions, but it's random as to whether the archive contains screenshots or videos.

The extra material features on cute coeds as well, so if you like the main porn, you're bound to like the bonus sites. Among them are the two I mentioned above and there is also Princess Blueyez and Taylor Twins.

Awhile back, it looked as though the website had stopped updating. After a hiatus of well over a year, they came back with non-nude and masturbation porn and then made the new design. You can access the old design, which contains a mix of fully-clothed babes who you won't find under the new version and some that you will. The current update schedule is a bit erratic, but it looks like you can average about five a month. If you can get past the complicated navigational issues, these babes will get you off.

Number of Reviews: 1422
Average Score: 64.2

Contact Rabbit
Write your review:
Site of the Day
User Rating: 90/100 (total: 1 comment)
  • Comment by: Aeropilt - Score: 90/100 - Date: 11/10/2009
    Ha Ha! Well, that's not me below (the spelling is atrocious!) but Phil-Flash has finally taken the leap into harder porn and , while we still have the cookie-cutter ass shots, we now have Kasia(!) a true wet dream, being drilled by the anonymous hand, as well as that Seattle tart "Chastity" sucking the big rubber one (and Mr. Waldo too!). So big props for changing the rules, but I still think some of the staleness survives.
$34.87/30 days, rebills at $27.89
$64.00/90 days
Cross Sales: 1 unchecked
Pic sets: 1299+ Pics per set: 90 Zip sets: No
Pic Res: N/A High Res: Yes
Number of movies: 643+ HD Porn: No Streaming: No
Average Length: 15 mins Full length videos: Yes Download Limits: No
Video Formats: Windows (960x540; 3000k)
MPEG (720x480; 3900k)
DivX (640x470; 1251k)
Windows (960x540; 4015k)
Preview members area
Independent Biller(s): CCBill
Customer Service:

Pros & Cons
pros -some great-quality videos
-bonus sites
-live cam shows
cons -inconsistent update schedule
-awkward navigation
-no streaming option
Main Category: Babes Porn
Updated on: 12/10/2011 12/10/2011- From 80 to 69: More content and resumed updating, but scores adjusted to new criteria. -Adam
11/18/2009- From 87 to 80: Quality, amount and updates scores adjusted to reflect current standards. Updating stopped. -Chris
04/22/2008- From 89 to 87: Updating a little less, but still a very good site. -Peacock
- Initial review: 9/16/2005
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Send to Reddit Send to StumbleUpon Email More...