Pros and Cons
- some high-res pics
- bonus sites
- downloadable videos
- high-end membership
- download limit
- discontinued updates
What do you imagine the "BFT" in BFT Girls stands for? I'll spare you the poorly planned joke regarding bread, feta and tomato sandwiches (since it's not your fault I skipped lunch) and tell you that it's an abbreviation for barefoot girls.
Nevertheless, some folks out there might not mind imagining their lunch being sandwiched between the soles of the feet of these BFTGirls who are hot and mostly panty-clad, while others might imagine their legs being spread open and buttered up by sweet girly toes until their pink is juicy. See, even non-traditional luncheon fare can be hot when you're hungry.
The video section contains 20 videos that are divided into short clips that you can download as Windows Media files. The vids vary in quality, but the best of them merely offer average-quality playback. The scenes are mostly solo, but there are also some lesbian encounters and footjobs on hand (or should I say on foot).
The babes seen alone do things like lick their own toes and then masturbate and the female-on-female couples lick each other's toes, among other places. There are also panties, pantyhose and stockings added into the action to make it even more erotic and enticing.
There are also something like 234 sets of photos and some contain high-res images. Each pictorial depicts gorgeous strip and tease scenes that focus on the feet of these delightful babes. Each set is available in parts, so at first it might look like there are more than there actually are.
In addition to the site's portion of feminine lower extremities, your membership gives you access to 30 bonus sites (at least a couple of which are also foot-fetish related), like Stormy Friday, True Tere, Piper Fawn, Porn Wipes and Bare Bree.
The BFT Girls membership is still a little pricey, which is disappointing given the site has stopped updating. Also, there is a download limit of 600MB per hour. If it weren't for the price, it would be easier to suggest giving the website a look, but with the cost being what it is, you might want to pass on this one.