Pros and Cons
- cheap membership
- exclusive content
- good navigation
- medium-res photo sets
- no videos
- discontinued updates
They say that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. If the result of having absolute power is being able to get chicks to take off all their clothes and model their sexy bodies for me, then I want to be as corrupt as humanly possible! That's because if there's one thing I've learned after visiting this site, it's that Reluctant Exposure on the part of a hottie is an incredible turn-on.
ReluctantExposure offers a somewhat unique experience and has a bit of a backstory. Years ago, it was basically what is now known as AMOC. However, when the niche failed to take off as anticipated, that other site was completely revamped in order to keep up with the times. So to keep its loyal fans happy, all of the original content was moved in order to create this site.
This leads to some ups and downs. For one thing, the producers acknowledge that it's a blast from the past that will never update again, so the cost is very low. However, never updating again means that you can't exactly expect to see the collection grow. So what's the unique experience I'm talking about? All of the content consists of "photostories." Basically, these are galleries in which all of the pics act out a story (hence the name). To help understand what's being discussed, there are captions between the columns of images.
The result is 70 photo stories, almost all of which deal with gorgeous gals who strip and pose reluctantly for other women (and some men). The reason they're reluctant varies from one story to another. For example, a female cop stumbles onto a pair of babes breaking the law and lets them get off scott-free in exchange for getting her off by assuming the nude position. Or a chick takes it off to keep her boss from firing her. Or a woman sheds her clothes in order to avoid eviction.
All of the pics are medium-res. Because the site uses HTML text on a black background, along with free-floating images around that text, the stories can't be saved in any fashion. They also make up the entire content, meaning there are no videos or extras.
The design is very lackluster and feels like it was set up in 1998, despite having launched in 2008 at the earliest. The content can all be found in a text-filled table that describes each scene and then links to the story in question. At the end of the day, it's easy to see why this site failed to take off a few years back. However, given its very inexpensive price, fans of erotic power-play stories and photos might like Reluctant Exposure for a month or so.