I have been a member of this site and other ATKingdom sites off and on since 2005. They have great content, no doubt about it. They must have had significant management changeover a few years ago. They started having significant problems then with site breaches, website issues etc. I had problems with my accounts at that time and since which required me to change passwords, usernames, etc. I was notified several times and had my accounts turned off because of apparent unauthorized use. I had to correspond repeatedly with their support department, and provide confidential information that most websites would never ask for, and should have available through their own records. During this time, I was usually treated poorly and like a suspect as if I had done something wrong or illegitimate. The smugness and ill treatment reached a crescendo recently causing me to cancel all my accounts. It saddened me to sever the business relationship, but customer service is important to some, and especially so in a competitive market. You will enjoy their sites until they have some problem that affects your accounts, then you will see the poor customer care when you see the hoops YOU are forced to jump through to resolve it, and the contempt with which you are treated. The only reason for the stars at all is due to their content.

• reply
• 0
• 0

If you're looking for content where girls look more natural, all over, this is definitely a good site to join. Obviously there's lots of content, as most of the models have photos, videos and a decent number of them are very sexy, in my opinion. Whether or not the photos and videos are HD quality depends on how recently the content was generated / how recently the models were working with the site, ie. as other people have said in reviews here already, there is still a lot of old content available, which is definitely worth avoiding in many cases because the quality really isn't great, and that can be frustrating when you think that a model is attractive, and then you find that all her content is from more than ten years ago. My biggest issue with the site, without question, is how so many of the photos have too much sharpening applied. Again, obviously the low resolution photos from ten plus years ago have this in spades, and that's common for old crappy looking content in general now, but that's not what even bothers me. For some reason, whether it's the individual photographers who work for the site, or perhaps it's people who edit, manage and upload the content, THERE IS STILL TOO MUCH SHARPENING APPLIED TO THE PHOTOS. The thumbnails look good, and I get excited about seeing larger versions for a certain model, as does anyone, whether it's medium or high resolution, but when I zoom in and or view the photo at 100%, much if not all of the power of the image is lost, when there's too much sharpening. The photo is of course of something natural, and too much sharpening is like a cheesy effect, that I find totally distracting. I would never join this site again, if it didn't have videos, but ultimately, it's still very frustrating because the photos of the most attractive models are just being wasted. There are other high quality sites that don't seem to do this and I can't understand why it seems to be so common for this one. Am I the only one who notices this?

• reply
• 0
• 0

Up until recently, this was a great site. But no new videos have been posted for two days in a row. Only one video per day was posted for a number of days before that. At least two new videos per day had been added to the site historically. My email inquiry was ignored. Has this site stopped adding videos? Many thanks.

• reply
• 0
• 0

I was very disappointed by this site. Although they show really many hairy pussies, most models were uninspiring. Many are old, fat or have ugly faces. for $ 34 I would have expected more.

• reply
• 0
• 0

Again the same, you mention the price $29.99, is not available,,,no one wantsto buy and suddenly surprise that the prices mentioned do not exist,,the truth is quite frustrating...Thanks

• reply
• 0
• 0