Tony Bennett left his heart in San Francisco, but the brave chicks on Nude In SF have left their clothes there. On purpose, I might add.
Sure, the NudeInSF chicks usually pick them up and put them back on in the end, but that's not always the case and even when it is, until they do so, they are walking the streets of San Francisco butt naked for all to see (and many people do see).
When I first started this job, the first voyeur/public nudity sites I saw were all a little disappointing in their execution of the niche. While the chicks were outside naked, often they would just be flashing bits of their bodies, and/or they would be in such secluded areas that if one person walked by it would be a surprise. However, this one has chicks getting fully nude and walking down the sidewalks of very busy streets right in the middle of one of America's biggest cities.
To put it simply, this site has lots of potential, but it just isn't living up to it. There are about 33 chicks and many of them have model bios that show each appears in multiple photo sets, but more often than not, it's just the same set broken up into multiple partial galleries. You'll find 106 "walks" (which is aptly named since each update shows the babe walking), but it's actually more like 60 picture sets give or take.
Each set comes with high-res pics, a short little "what happened during this walk" paragraph and a "nude map," which is a fun addition. Basically, it is a Google map with the route the chicks walked marked off (the tour even says the site is a good way to see San Francisco).
My biggest disappointment with the site is that there are only four videos. None of them are full-length files and only the most recent clip can be streamed. Every clip is downloadable in Windows Media format, with the majority having good-quality playback.
When it comes to these types of sites the videos are the most exciting aspect. Pictures are good, but watching a video and seeing the chick get naked and walk among the people totally naked with everyone reacting to her is the real essence of the public nudity experience.
Another problem you'll have is with the update schedule. There hasn't been a new movie in years and updates to the photo section are very irregular. On top of this, they're usually in the form of a few more pics being added to existing galleries. A completely original update hasn't occurred since 2011.
The design is basically nonexistent, too. Each page is about 80% whitespace with simple black font and gray text links. You need to rely on your browser's "back" button a lot, too. All of the videos are dumped on one page, but at least the photo sets are divided by model. There are preview photos for every full and partial gallery, too, but not on the update page which relies solely on more text.
There aren't any extras and you no longer have a monthly membership plan to select. Instead, you have to wait for a trial membership to rebill at the 30-day membership if you want to be a member for more than a week. Still, despite its numerous faults, it's inexpensive enough to make it worth taking a look.
|By: A.K. Anderson|
|Number of Reviews: 1449|
|Average Score: 64.6|
|$4.95/7 days, rebills at $9.95|
|Cross Sales: No|
|Pic sets: 60+||Pics per set: 60||Zip sets: Yes|
|Pic Res: 3000x2000||High Res: Yes|
|Number of movies: 4+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: Yes|
|Average Length: 8 mins||Full length videos: No||Download Limits: No
Windows (640x360; 3649k; streaming)
Windows (640x360; 1581k)
Windows (640x360; 3649k)
Pros & Cons
-really low price
-photo sets update rarely and in parts
-discontinued video updates
-no monthly membership
- Initial review: 9/4/2008