Cyber Kim

Full Review

Dylan Taylor 

By: Dylan Taylor
Number of Reviews: 112
Average Score: 63

This site is closed.
Cyber Kim bills itself as being the home of 'a cyber Asian cutie.' Kim is definitely a cute. In fact, that's an understatement. She is so beautiful and sexy that I was expecting a lot from a site that turned out to be very disappointing.

The design of CyberKim is pretty good. It looks nice and it's easy to find everything. There is a menu bar on the left side of the page that will direct you all the site has to offer, most if which will be found in the photo or video sections. I suppose another big draw is the live cam page. I didn't catch a show myself, but the schedule suggests that Kim makes an appearance every night.

The photo section offers some good material and a higher percentage of exclusive content. There are roughly 62 galleries so far, most have high-res pictures and most have the site's watermark. Most of the photo galleries feature Kim, but many do not, which is a little disappointing considering what you'd expect from a site dedicated to a single chick.

The content ranges from glamour photos, more revealing shoots and there is the odd blowjob. However, the galleries range dramatically in size. You'll find anywhere from eight to 100 shots in a gallery. One of the rare blowjob scenes that actually involves Kim, for example, has only eight shots. Other galleries are large, but look like they are behind-the-scenes type photos of trips and not actual porn shoots.

The video section offers more content and, specifically, more hardcore content. However, the 71 videos can only be streamed in low to average quality. There is also a much higher ratio of nonexclusive content and a lower ratio of content that stars Kim. Many of the videos do not bear a watermark and do not seem to involve Kim nor do they even seem at all related.

The videos that feature our cyber Asian cutie tend to be on the softcore side. The hardcore videos are almost all involving other models. One other problem is that while some videos are around 20 minutes long, others only last for about nine seconds. Yes, nine seconds.

The site seems to be updating at a rate of about once a week, but there doesn't seem to be much in terms of bonus content. There are some extras, like a new 'what's new section' and a very sparse 'about me' page.

Kim is gorgeous, she has a really beautiful smile and a great body and it would be really easy for her to put together a good site. It could be entirely softcore or not, it could be whatever she wants. To be good, all it would have to do is offer better quality and content in which she is actually involved.

Cyber Kim offers a good amount of content and its star is a breathtaking beauty. That said, too much of the content is nonexclusive, unrelated material that is displayed in very average-quality. As much as I wish I could, I can't give this site a good recommendation.

Member Area Screenshots

  • Screenshot 1
  • Screenshot 2
  • Screenshot 3
  • Screenshot 4

Write Your Review

* Please include a pro and a con about the site. Balance is essential in making a comment worthwhile. Scores without comments will be deleted.

* Watch out for ratings of zero and 100. In our opinion, there is no such thing as a site that is absolutely perfect or completely worthless.

Remaining characters:  

Latest Comments

  • Comment by: Wide Open Spaces

    Score: 45% Date: 03/06/2013

    She doesn't update the site so beware of that. What's there is there and it won't ever change. If you're a fan of her, there are lots of good photo sets there, available for download. So that is a pro. Worth joining for a month, I suppose, if you like her. Compared to the mega sites, totally not worth it though. Those sites have thousands of models and scenes for a lower price. This site is priced higher for just this one model. But I guess this site is for those that enjoy cam models and cam shows are never cheap and never a good value. So I suppose value isn't what potential members of this site are after. Recommended, but I sure wouldn't stay in for more than one month. I didn't see the $2.95 trial, so I guess that isn't available any longer.