Porn ReviewsSpecialsAdult PersonalsPorn TrialsPorn BlogSearchBookmark
Review
Stop!
We no longer link to this site.

Within amateur porn, there are a couple subsections that give the genre a different flavor. One involves amateur chicks being filmed by professionals in porn-type situations, while the other one involves amateurs filming themselves. Real GFs mostly deals with the latter.

RealGFs have gone trhough a considerable redesign. While the old site focused on real couples and their hot encounters, the focus now is on user-submitted content that features 18 to 23-year-olds. There are a bunch of videos and photo galleries of gals having fun by themselves or with their lovers.

Like all homemade video sites, this one has some pretty standard things. Because it all depends on the individual equipment and lighting, there is no consistency among the videos. I saw some that looked fairly clear, while most were pretty bad. They can be streamed or downloaded and often come in a few different formats. The best flicks come in excellent-quality Windows Media format.

Something to remember about the content is that these are real people filming themselves. While I find that a hot idea, some of them just don't make good porn. Some scenes are hot, some are awkward and some are both. I saw one threesome where everyone looks like they could be pros, but also a squirting vid with such poor filming that it might as well have been someone watering their lawn.

There are 3,776 videos broken up in two sections. There are 733 videos of amateur material, like webcamera shows, home recorded sex flings and other goodies in the "exclusive movies" section (which is misleading because none of the content is exclusive). The remaining vids can be found in "movies" and features nonexclusive scenes with professional material.

Many of the 969 sets of pics are quite hot. Some have a random assortment and the rest focus on an amateur chick by herself or with a group of friends. Some of these shots are high-res and professional-looking, while others are lo-res and quite grainy. They used to have Zip files, but now they don't.

New material is added to the website almost every day, most of it being videos. Real GFs isn't the best made-at-home porn site out there, but for the price it's pretty good. It will provide you with the amateur action you are looking for.

By:
Number of Reviews: 1425
Average Score: 64.2

Contact Rabbit
 
User Rating: 25/100 (total: 2 comments)
  • Comment by: dan - Score: 50/100 - Date: 10/16/2011
    pro: good advertising

    con: the trial period is restricted to 4 episodes of two parts each. The actual movies dont even match up with the marquee. Total joke and a shame because you really dont get a feel of what you will get with full access.
  • Comment by: Disappointed - Score: N/A - Date: 10/10/2011
    The site has many updates. However, most of them are not user submitted nor amateurs. There are A LOT of 5-8 year old professional porn shoots. Gauge and Addison are just a part of what is offered by realgfs.com. They do heavy advertising for sites such as daredorm.com by offering picture samples from them. The "bonus DVDs are just a collection of handjob videos (a bunch, but that's all it is). The bonus sites that they advertise do not exist.
Price:
$1.00/2 days, rebills at $39.99
$19.99/30 days
Cross Sales: 1 pre-checked
Content
Pic sets: 969+ Pics per set: 30 Zip sets: Yes
Pic Res: N/A High Res: Yes
Number of movies: 3776+ HD Porn: No Streaming: Yes
Average Length: 4 mins Full length videos: Yes Download Limits: No
 
Video Formats: MPEG (320x240; 1000k)
Windows (640x480; 2000k)
Flash (640x480; 520k; streaming)
Preview RealGFs.com members area
Support
Independent Biller(s): CCBill, Epoch
Customer Service: realgfs@gmail.com


Pros & Cons
pros -frequent updates
-low-end membership fee
-some excellent-quality videos
cons -variable-quality content
-nonexclusive content
-no portable formats
Updated on: 12/22/2010 12/22/2010- From 77 to 76: The content is not exclusive. -Wayne
06/26/2010- From 74 to 77: Less content, but video quality improved. -Chris
02/19/2010- From 69 to 74: Video quality improved and amount increased. -Tuesday
11/04/2009- From 71 to 69: Video quality decreased. -Bryce
- Initial review: 2/3/2008
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Send to Reddit Send to StumbleUpon Email More...