The only reason I say that is because of the amount of content, which at this point totals 13 videos and 50 photo sets. To make matters worse, SweetPeaches has gone years without updating. Her conent is dated and those dates tell us that this beautiful girl has not added any new material to her collection since September 2011.
The news isn't all bad. though. First off, she is one sexy babe. Second, her solo scenes feature full nudity and some very hot fingers-in-pussy play. She looks great both by herself or with her sexy gal pals. In one scene I checked out, she teams up with two very sexy babes to engage in a Sapphic photo session that will find itself in my dreams for a while to come - and cum (if you know what I mean).
Another check in the "good" column is the quality of the content. The videos tend to offer good-quality playback and the photos are all high-res images. You can download the movies as either MPEG or Windows Media files and the pic sets can be viewed in slideshows and downloaded in Zip files. No, there is no streaming option, though.
Yet another "good" checkmark is the access to 12 other "sweet" babe sites. These girls are in the same hotness league, but their sites are also generally small, have more pictures than videos and are not updating. They include the likes of Sweet Zuzanna, Sweet Tiffany, Sweet Ira, Sweet Monika and Sweet Marci. Strangely, two onsite sections with pics and flicks from the producer Viv Thomas seem to be updated regularly.
So, as you can see, there are definitely some good things to be said about her, her site and her content. However, the number of checks in the "not good" column - namely the minimal amount of porn and lack of updates - kind of take precedence, making a membership to Sweet Peaches just not worth it.
|The Best Porn||Review||12/4/2007||72/100|
|Average Score: 72|
|Cross Sales: No|
|Pic sets: 50||Pics per set: 150||Zip sets: Yes|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: Yes|
|Number of movies: 13+||HD Porn: No||DRM protection: No|
|Average Length: 9 mins||Full length videos: Yes||Streaming: No|
|Condoms: N/A||Download Limits: No
Windows (640x480; 1900k)
MPEG (726x408; 1900k)
|Independent Biller(s):||CCBill, Epoch|
Pros & Cons
-mostly good-quality videos
-zipped high-res photo sets
-no streaming option
07/05/2012- From 62 to 55: Scores adjusted to new criteria. -Chris
04/04/2011- Stays at 62. -Chris
12/08/2010- From 62 to 61: No longer updating. -Will
06/29/2010- From 68 to 62: Amount score adjusted to current criteria and discontinued video updates. -Charlie
05/02/2009- From 69 to 68: No recent updates. -Giraffe
07/25/2008- From 72 to 69: Content/price improved. Updates decreased. -Sloth - Initial review: 11/2/2007