Yes, there is some real hardcore, rough use-the-chicks-for-your-pleasure fucking on AllRoughSex, but there is also some more mild hardcore action that will only shock you if you have never seen porn before. The reason for that is because this is a huge nonexclusive porn archive and when you have 572 movies they are obviously not all going to be not-for-the-weak type porn.
The site has a very simple design and is easy to navigate and there are now categories like "orgies," "creampies," and "gangbang," though there isn't much point, because I checked out a flick in the creampie section and the chick gets a moutful of jizz at the end. Knowing your ass from your elbow is one thing, but unleashing in the wrong end of a babe is another entirely.
All the basic hardcore niches are covered, though. I saw loads of anal sex, threesomes, facials, blowjobs, DPs and even some gangbangs and interracial fucking. The scenes are all downloadable in a mediocre-quality Windows Media format and in an AVI format that sometimes offers great-quality playback. Each scene also comes with a set of crappy vid caps. There are no actual photos.
Your membership also gets you access to an area where you'll find 33 additional flicks that you can download as Windows Media files and DivX-formated AVIs. They show coeds in action and they're just as hot and as raunchy as the main movies.
The site seems to have stopped updating and it's fairly pricey for a website that only offers nonexclusive material. Still, you do get a lot for a money, so joining All Rough Sex might be worthwhile for some.
|Cross Sales: No|
|Pic sets: 0||Pics per set: 0||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: 572+||HD Porn: No||DRM protection: No|
|Average Length: 20 mins||Full length videos: Yes||Streaming: No|
|Condoms: None||Download Limits: No
Windows (480x320; 512k)
AVI (576x384; 1743k)
|Independent Biller(s):||CCBill, NetCash|
Pros & Cons
-some great-quality videos
02/06/2010- From 67 to 65: Update and amount scores adjusted to current criteria. -Charlie
05/11/2009- From 62 to 67: Quality score adjusted to reflect current standards. -Sloth
10/24/2008- From 72 to 62: Average bitrate, no new updates, price increase. -Rhino - Initial review: 8/12/2007