The layout on BodyBuildersInHeat is simple. The homepage features links to content from the bonus sites (more on them later) and an announcement that a new bodybuilder model is "coming soon." The top menu has links to the various areas and under "model galleries" you can download the 98 videos.
The vids can be streamed in an embedded player and also downloaded. They're usually available in a Windows Media format that's below average in quality, but the newer flicks can be had as either average-quality Windows Media files or good-quality MP4s, depending on the movie.
There are also 98 photo galleries featuring the muscular babes in the raunchiest of sex. Some of these ladies are more muscular than others and there is at least one or two I would call real bodybuilders. Most of the chicks, however, just have toned bodies and big silicone tits. You get about 70 or so good-looking pics per set and they contain solo posing and hardcore action.
One of the scenes I watched was a bit of a letdown simply because Austin Kincaid is not what I would call a bodybuilder type. Don't get me wrong, though, her toned body and size still make her an Amazon and she is super hot. The scene is pretty typical as she walks in, shows off that awesome body, masturbates on a couch and sucks and rides a dude's cock. It's a hot hardcore scene, but there isn't enough rippling muscle on this babe.
Nothing is dated, so it is unclear how often new content is added to the collection. That said, they've only added three new scenes since February 2012. With this in mind, you might find yourself having to wait a while to get new material. If you do, you can keep busy by exploring 18 other Channel 69 VIP network sites, including Big Clits Big Lips, Lesbian Chunky Chicks, Lesbian Mature 69, Double Air Bags and Dirty Kinky Mature.
At the end of the day, you've got to ask yourself just how badly you want to see muscular chicks in hardcore action, because last I checked, it isn't easy to find porn in this niche. Body Builders In Heat has a great concept, but offering higher-quality videos and updating on a regular basis would do a lot to improve its score.
|Number of Reviews: 220|
|Average Score: 66.5|
|$4.95/3 days, rebills at $29.95|
|Cross Sales: No|
|Pic sets: 98+||Pics per set: 70||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: 640x480||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: 98+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: Yes|
|Average Length: 18 mins||Full length videos: Yes||Download Limits: No
Windows (640x352; 672k)
MP4 (640x480; 1600k; streaming)
MP4 (640x480; 1600k)
Windows (640x352; 1000k)
Pros & Cons
-many low-quality vids
-no zipped photo sets
02/12/2012- From 76 to 63: A little more content, but scores adjusted to new criteria. -A.K.
10/15/2010- From 75 to 76: Video quality improved. -Wayne
03/12/2010- From 73 to 75: More content. A.K.
10/16/2009- From 69 to 73: Slowed updating, but more content and more bonus sites. -A.K.
05/15/2009- Feom 66 to 69: Decreased quality, but improved design and more frequent updates and content. -Groundhog
03/22/2009- From 59 to 66: Adjusted score to reflect exclusivity of content. -Rhino
06/11/2008- From 58 to 59: Quality/price improved. Updates schedule decreased. -Sloth - Initial review: 5/16/2007