I've heard of the New York Times, but I have never had anyone offer to deliver Porn Times to my house every morning. I will give them the benefit of the doubt that they are a legitimate publication. However, if that's true, then they really have to fire the members of the staff that rated Big Fucking Orgy the number one hardcore site.
BigFuckingOrgy is a big fucking site, I'll give it that, but I won't give it much else. First off, let's make something clear. A threesome isn't an orgy! An orgy has four participants or more and you would think a porn site would know that. Way to much of the BigFuckingOrgy content is threesome action and not valid as what true orgy lovers would want. Let's look at what's available. The main content comes in the guise of 61 photo sets. The quality of the pictures is good.
There are no main videos, but instead just eight group sex feeds. Yes, that's it and of those eight links, four of them are threesome sites. Video quality varies among the sites as is to be expected from feeds. The rest of the site is filled with loads more content covering a variety of categories and niches, such as the 660 additional feeds covering other hardcore themes.
The 70 bonus sites are a mixed bag as you can tell from these examples, Moms I Would Like to Fuck, Who Wants To Fuck A Billionaire, 24 Inches of Pain , Deputy Dick and Now Hiring Sluts. The price tag might seem reasonable based on the sheer amount of content you get. The fact that it is all feeds, nonexclusive and most of it isn't even orgy action should be a warning that Big Fucking Orgy is a big fucking disappointment.
