Pros and Cons
- high-res photos
- mostly exclusive content
- zip downloads
- no bonus sites
- unclear udpate schedule
- no advanced search
I figured the best way to start this review was to use the site's own words. Glam And Glossy describes itself as "the premier website for non adult glamour girl photos and videos." Let's see if that's true, shall we?
If you are like me then the "non adult" thing threw you off when you first read it. I was looking at girls' tits right there on the tour, so what were they talking about? What I could gather was that the babes were glamour girls and models and not pornstars. And they aren't looking to change their status - at least not on this site.
The GlamAndGlossy collection is softcore. These beautiful models pose and strip, but they do it all while keeping their pussies hidden from view and letting their tits and asses and pretty faces be the stars of the show.
As for the photos and videos mentioned in the description I can tell you that there are currently 275 photo sets and only 14 videos (some are in HD). Not only are there way fewer movies, but the vids only seem to average about two minutes each. Taking all this into account this is primarily a photo site.
Speaking of the photos, they can all be downloaded in Zip files and the images are high-res. The one downside to the sets is that they are generally rather small, averaging about 20 pics each.
The design and navigation are good and there are a few extra features. There is a very basic search option and you can save pic sets and vids to your favorites. Also, you can sort the photo and video sections by "all," "latest," and by various letters that correspond to the names of the models, although most of these are more appropriately called filters rather than sorting.
The girls are definitely gorgeous, but there aren't any bonus sites and with nothing being dated I can't confirm any kind of update schedule. Obviously, this isn't the premier website for non-adult glamour-girl movies. As for the photos, things look much better, but is it "premier?" I wouldn't say so.