Alright, so Sandl Babes triggered my pet peeve alarm. I don't know about you, but whenever a site has an intentionally odd spelling, I need to know why that is. Is it for effect? Is it a pun? I mean, how the heck can a babe be sandl? What is sandl to begin with? Are they new flip flops? Alas, no explanation was given, so I'll just cheer myself up by staring at the hot naked chicks here. Huh. Suddenly I'm feeling a whole lot better.
Whoever hires the talent for SandlBabes deserves a raise because he or she has found some seriously hot women. You won't find any big-name pornstars, but each chick I looked at could give them a run for their money. It doesn't look like many went under the knife either, but I spotted some of the biggest, beautiful juggs I've ever seen on a few of these babes. You'll also find hotties with smaller breasts, gals with gorgeous booties and lovely legs.
That said, the design looks much more amateurish than the models do. It's a basic white background with a few text links taking you to photo and video sections. There are two movie sections, with the main one having 32 videos. The other one focuses on guest models and has 31 vids. For the mathematically impaired out there, that's a total of 63 movies.
You could argue that the movies act as behind-the-scenes footage to the photo sessions, because each vid is a Q and A between the model and the cameraman while she poses and he photographs everything. Speaking of which, you get 32 picture sets.
The models pose in and out of their clothes. A small amount of scenes are non-nude, but most start off in lingerie and stop once the babe is fully naked. There's some very minor petting now and then, but not what you would really call masturbation (don't expect any fingers being inserted into pussies).
A new video and a new photo set are each added once a week, roughly two days apart. However, with scene titles like "Video 121," it looks like new content replaces older material. Also supporting this idea is the fact that none of the babes who appear on the tour page show up in the members' area.
As for the videos themselves, the quality varies from scene to scene. The majority of the scenes are high-def, but those that aren't are still good in quality. Meanwhile, the galleries contain a mix of high-res and low-res images. Unfortunately, you can't save them in Zip files.
I really like the content and the babes on this site. For softcore amateur material, it's very well made and the chicks are quite hot. However, the collection won't keep you busy for too long.
|By: Adam Strong|
|Number of Reviews: 483|
|Average Score: 62.2|
|$25.00/30 days, rebills at $15.00|
|Cross Sales: 2 unchecked|
|Pic sets: 32+||Pics per set: 50||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: 1024x768||High Res: Yes|
|Number of movies: 63+||HD Porn: Yes||Streaming: No|
|Average Length: 7 mins||Full length videos: Yes||Download Limits: No
Windows (1280x720; 6000k)
Pros & Cons
-mostly high-def movies
-many high-res photos
-no streaming format
-new content replaces old content