This review is outdated. Information may be inaccurate.
As you might expect from a site called LatinKittys, the gals are all Latina babes. I am a big fan of the spicy, tanned chicks and once I signed in I was quite happy with what I saw in the model index. What I was not happy about was the design of the members' area, which doesn't look as sick as the tour pages. It has an ugly yellow, green and white color scheme and could really use an update.
I found 48 videos. Eight of them are in the lesbian section, the hardcore ones are now found on one of the bonus sites (Latin XXX Girls) and the rest are solo masturbation scenes where many use vibrators. The main problem with the movies is the poor to average-quality playback of the Windows Media movies and some of the have DRM protection.
There are about 247 photo galleries. Again, you'll find eight the lesbian section. All of the other spreads show softcore solo posing and there are some candid, behind-the-scenes shots too. The pictures are medium-res images that look sharp for the most part.
The collection hasn't added new material since 2008 and both of the bonus sites are small and also don't seem to be updating. Add to that the discovery of DRM files and the mediocre-looking videos and I'd say that Latin Kittys is a hard sell. This site has a hot cast of ladies, but they would benefit greatly from some serious upgrades in quality and quantity.
|By: A.K. Anderson|
|Number of Reviews: 1472|
|Average Score: 65.6|
|$13.86/7 days, rebills at $28.67|
|Cross Sales: 1 unchecked|
|Pic sets: 247+||Pics per set: 40||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: N/A||High Res: No|
|Number of movies: 48+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: No|
|Average Length: 3 mins||Full length videos: Yes||Download Limits: No
Windows (540x360; 711k)
Pros & Cons
-some DRM-protected files
-no streaming movies
05/26/2010- Stays at 63. -Suzie
10/22/2009- Stays at 63. -Penelope
12/20/2008- From 70 to 63: No recent updates and quality score adusted to current standard. -Giraffe - Initial review: 12/9/2005