Sure, there are plenty of hot, sexy babes doing porn, but there is always room for fresh talent. On We Need New Talents, eager actresses come to the casting couch to show off what they've got and many of them are going on camera for the first time.
WeNeedNewTalents is devoid of color and doesn't have a nice design, but checking out the content is easy and involves browsing the pages, which are displayed with a few thumbnails, the chick's name, her age and a little write-up about how she got there. The bonus content can be found by simply scrolling down the main page. The babes are very sexy and have a great amateur look (because many of them are, I assume, real first-timers).
There are 31 videos and 16 come with a set of high-res photos. The vids are all available for download in average-quality Windows Media files. Some are also available as MPEGs. There is, unfortunately, no option to download the video in one full-length file or to stream it. Instead, you have to save clips. At least each part has a thumbnail next to it, so you have a basic idea of where in the scene that particular part occurs.
The movies begin like an interview and lead pretty quickly into the gal stripping and getting down to business, which includes a cock in her mouth and pussy and, for many of them, the ass (although it's always one hole at a time). The problem, however, is that the site has stopped updating, because there haven't been any new scenes added in a long time.
Bonus content includes the complete Teen Core Club network of sites, including Teens Go Porn, Teach My Ass and Girls Got Cream. There is also another network of porn sites to check out, for a total of 40 bonus sites.
We Need New Talents had potential when we first looked at it years go, but it stopped short of achieving that greatness when they stopped posting new material. As it stands now, the network is appealing and so are the chicks on the site, but I just can't give it a recommendation.
|By: A.K. Anderson|
|Number of Reviews: 1465|
|Average Score: 65.5|
|Cross Sales: 1 unchecked|
|Pic sets: 16+||Pics per set: 130||Zip sets: No|
|Pic Res: 1024x768||High Res: Yes|
|Number of movies: 31+||HD Porn: No||Streaming: No|
|Average Length: 30 mins||Full length videos: No||Download Limits: No
Windows (640x480; 1200k)
MPEG (288x240; 1080k)
|Independent Biller(s):||CCBill, Epoch|
Pros & Cons
-only average-quality videos
-no streaming option
03/09/2013- From 72 to 54: Scores adjusted to new criteria. -A.K.
09/09/2011- Stays at 72. -Chris
01/28/2011- Stays at 72. -Wayne
04/27/2010- From 74 to 72: Discontinued updates. -Charlie
10/08/2009- From 74 to 73: Scores now reflect current standards. -Penelope
02/11/2009- From 75 to 74: Criteria adjustments. -Peacock
06/05/2008- Stays at 75. -Rabbit - Initial review: 4/24/2005